4 Novembre 2026

Psicologia Punto One | Psicologia e Psicologi nel Web

SCHEDA SCIENTIFICA2026Altra ricerca

SET Domain Genes in Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Aki Ohguri, Tadashi Nakagawa, Makiko Nakagawa, Toru Hosoi

Genes · 2026

Abstract originale

Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) comprise a genetically and clinically heterogeneous group of conditions, with disruption of chromatin regulation and developmental gene-expression programs representing an important molecular mechanism underlying their pathogenesis. SET domain-containing (SETD) proteins constitute a diverse family of chromatin regulators that primarily mediate histone methylation, although some lack demonstrated intrinsic catalytic activity or modify non-histone substrates. Pathogenic variants in multiple SETD genes, including SETD1A, KMT2D, SETD2, NSD1, and EZH2, cause NDDs characterized by developmental delay, intellectual disability, speech and language impairment, autism-related features, epilepsy, growth abnormalities, and congenital anomalies. Representative examples include SETD1A-related neurodevelopmental disorder (OMIM #619056), KMT2D-related Kabuki syndrome type 1 (OMIM #147920), SETD2-related Luscan-Lumish syndrome (OMIM #616831), NSD1-related Sotos syndrome (OMIM #117550), and EZH2-related Weaver syndrome (OMIM #277590). In this review, we summarize the classification, domain architecture, and molecular functions of human SETD proteins and integrate clinical findings with mechanistic insights obtained from genetically modified mouse models. These studies reveal substantial cross-species convergence in cognitive, behavioral, synaptic, and developmental phenotypes while also demonstrating that individual SETD proteins regulate distinct molecular processes. Importantly, phenotypic similarity does not necessarily indicate a common molecular mechanism, and variant-specific effects, including loss-of-function, gain-of-function, dominant-negative, and substrate-selective alterations, must be considered when interpreting experimental models. Several studies further demonstrate partial reversibility of molecular and behavioral abnormalities through restoration of SETD protein function, inhibition of opposing chromatin-modifying enzymes such as LSD1, or correction of downstream signaling pathways. These findings suggest that therapeutic opportunities may extend beyond transcriptional regulation to downstream processes including translation, synaptic function, and cellular signaling. Integrating human genetics with animal and human cellular models will therefore be essential for defining shared and gene-specific mechanisms and identifying therapeutically actionable pathways in SETD-related NDDs.

Parole chiave

HumansNeurodevelopmental DisordersHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseAnimalsSET domainchromatin regulationepigenetic regulationhistone methylationintellectual disabilityneurodevelopmental disorders
Leggi il testo integrale originale

Testo estratto dalla pubblicazione: sono esclusi immagini, media, supplementi e parti soggette a diritti distinti.

SET Domain Genes in Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) comprise a genetically and clinically heterogeneous group of conditions, with disruption of chromatin regulation and developmental gene-expression programs representing an important molecular mechanism underlying their pathogenesis. SET domain-containing (SETD) proteins constitute a diverse family of chromatin regulators that primarily mediate histone methylation, although some lack demonstrated intrinsic catalytic activity or modify non-histone substrates. Pathogenic variants in multiple SETD genes, including SETD1A, KMT2D, SETD2, NSD1, and EZH2, cause NDDs characterized by developmental delay, intellectual disability, speech and language impairment, autism-related features, epilepsy, growth abnormalities, and congenital anomalies. Representative examples include SETD1A-related neurodevelopmental disorder (OMIM #619056), KMT2D-related Kabuki syndrome type 1 (OMIM #147920), SETD2-related Luscan–Lumish syndrome (OMIM #616831), NSD1-related Sotos syndrome (OMIM #117550), and EZH2-related Weaver syndrome (OMIM #277590). In this review, we summarize the classification, domain architecture, and molecular functions of human SETD proteins and integrate clinical findings with mechanistic insights obtained from genetically modified mouse models. These studies reveal substantial cross-species convergence in cognitive, behavioral, synaptic, and developmental phenotypes while also demonstrating that individual SETD proteins regulate distinct molecular processes. Importantly, phenotypic similarity does not necessarily indicate a common molecular mechanism, and variant-specific effects, including loss-of-function, gain-of-function, dominant-negative, and substrate-selective alterations, must be considered when interpreting experimental models. Several studies further demonstrate partial reversibility of molecular and behavioral abnormalities through restoration of SETD protein function, inhibition of opposing chromatin-modifying enzymes such as LSD1, or correction of downstream signaling pathways. These findings suggest that therapeutic opportunities may extend beyond transcriptional regulation to downstream processes including translation, synaptic function, and cellular signaling. Integrating human genetics with animal and human cellular models will therefore be essential for defining shared and gene-specific mechanisms and identifying therapeutically actionable pathways in SETD-related NDDs.

1. Introduction

Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) comprise a heterogeneous group of conditions characterized by disturbances in cognitive, behavioral, social, language, or motor development [1,2]. Large-scale sequencing studies have identified numerous risk genes involved in chromatin organization and transcriptional regulation, supporting the concept that disruption of developmental gene-expression programs represents a major route to NDD pathogenesis [3,4,5,6,7]. Among these regulators, genes encoding SET domain-containing (SETD) proteins have emerged as an important group associated with developmental abnormalities.

The SET domain derives its name from the Drosophila proteins Suppressor of variegation 3–9, Enhancer of zeste, and Trithorax, which catalyze the methylation of specific lysine residues on histones [8]. Histone lysine methylation contributes to the regulation of chromatin organization and transcription through mechanisms that depend on the modified residue, degree of methylation, genomic localization, and cellular context. Although H3K4 and H3K36 methylation are generally associated with transcriptionally permissive chromatin, whereas H3K9, H3K27, and H4K20 methylation are frequently linked to transcriptional repression, these associations do not imply strictly activating or repressive functions [9,10]. For example, H3K4me3 is predominantly enriched at active promoters, whereas H3K4me1 is commonly associated with enhancers, including both active and poised regulatory elements [11]. Similarly, H3K36me3 is enriched within transcribed gene bodies, where it contributes to transcriptional fidelity by suppressing cryptic intragenic transcription [12]. Furthermore, H3K36me2/3 can antagonize PRC2-mediated H3K27 methylation [13,14], illustrating the functional interplay between distinct histone modifications. Thus, the biological consequences of histone methylation cannot be inferred solely from the identity of the modified residue but must be interpreted in the context of its genomic distribution and associated regulatory machinery (Figure 1).

A subset of SETD proteins lack demonstrated intrinsic catalytic activity, whereas others methylate non-histone substrates or target amino acid residues other than lysine. The SET domain is a conserved protein domain comprising approximately 130–140 amino acid residues and is annotated in established protein-domain databases, including InterPro (IPR001214) and PROSITE (SET domain profile, PS50280). Although SET domains share a conserved three-dimensional fold that is fundamentally distinct from that of conventional methyltransferases [15,16], their primary sequences exhibit considerable divergence among different protein families. In catalytically active SETD proteins, the SET domain mediates methyl-group transfer, typically using S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) as a methyl-group donor. Previous sequence and structural analyses have identified conserved motifs and residues involved in SAM binding, substrate recognition, and methyl-group transfer [17]. Notably, comparative analyses of SET domains from representative methyltransferases, including KMT2A, KMT2C, NSD1, and ASH1L, have demonstrated that KMT2E and SETD5 exhibit substantial divergence at residues implicated in catalytic activity and cofactor binding [18]. These observations are consistent with the absence of detectable intrinsic methyltransferase activity for KMT2E under the experimental conditions examined and the lack of firmly established intrinsic catalytic activity for SETD5. Thus, despite conservation of the overall SET-domain architecture, variations in amino acid sequences and residues associated with catalysis contribute to the functional diversity of SETD proteins. Importantly, the presence of an annotated SET domain does not necessarily indicate intrinsic methyltransferase activity or equivalent substrate specificity.

The three-dimensional organization of the SET domain is illustrated by the experimentally determined crystal structure of human SETD2 in complex with an H3K36M histone peptide and SAM (PDB ID: 5V21; Figure 2) [19]. This structure, resolved at 2.42 Å by X-ray crystallography, provides insights into the structural organization of the SET domain and the molecular basis of cofactor binding and histone substrate recognition.

Experimental mouse models carrying mutations in SETD genes provide an essential complement to human genetic studies by enabling systematic investigation of the molecular, cellular, and developmental consequences of altered SETD protein function. Such models allow candidate disease mechanisms to be examined under controlled genetic conditions and facilitate determination of the developmental stages, tissues, and cell types in which individual genes exert their critical functions [20,21].

In this review, we summarize the classification, domain architecture, and evolutionary relationships of human SETD proteins and discuss the neurodevelopmental phenotypes associated with SETD gene mutations in humans and mice. This review focuses on SETD protein families that include at least one member with an established association with NDDs. Accordingly, families and individual proteins without established NDD associations, such as the PRDM family, SETD6, SETD7, and SETMAR, are not discussed. Nevertheless, selected proteins without established NDD associations are included to illustrate the structural and functional diversity within NDD-associated SETD protein families and to facilitate comparisons among family members. By integrating molecular, experimental, and clinical evidence, this review aims to provide a framework for understanding the biological basis of SETD protein-related NDDs and to identify priorities for future mechanistic studies and therapeutic development.

2. SETD1/KMT2 and Its Related Families

The SETD1/KMT2 family comprises six principal human H3K4 methyltransferases: SETD1A, SETD1B, KMT2A (also known as MLL1), KMT2B (also known as MLL2), KMT2C (also known as MLL3), and KMT2D (also known as MLL4) (Figure 1 and Figure 3). These proteins form three evolutionarily related pairs corresponding to the Drosophila Set1 (SETD1A and SETD1B), Trithorax (KMT2A and KMT2B), and Trithorax-related (KMT2C and KMT2D) branches [22,23,24]. Their catalytic SET domains are located near the C terminus and function within multiprotein COMPASS or COMPASS-like complexes containing the conserved core components WDR5, RBBP5, ASH2L, and DPY30, or their evolutionary counterparts. The organization and H3K4 methyltransferase function of these complexes are evolutionarily conserved from yeast to mammals, although their catalytic activities and methylation-state preferences have diversified. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Set1 is the principal H3K4 methyltransferase and catalyzes mono-, di-, and trimethylation within the COMPASS complex [25,26]. In Drosophila melanogaster, three related methyltransferases, dSet1, Trithorax (Trx), and Trithorax-related (Trr), function in distinct COMPASS-like complexes. Among these, dSet1 is primarily responsible for global H3K4 di- and trimethylation [27,28], whereas Trr preferentially contributes to enhancer-associated H3K4 monomethylation [29]. Mammals possess six corresponding methyltransferases organized into three major subfamilies: SETD1A/SETD1B, KMT2A/KMT2B, and KMT2C/KMT2D. Consistent with their evolutionary relationships, SETD1A/SETD1B complexes contribute substantially to H3K4 trimethylation, particularly at gene promoters [30,31,32], whereas KMT2C/KMT2D complexes are major regulators of enhancer-associated H3K4 monomethylation [32,33,34]. KMT2A/KMT2B complexes exhibit more context-dependent activities, contributing to H3K4 methylation at selected genomic loci [32,35,36]. Furthermore, biochemical reconstitution studies of human SETD1/KMT2 complexes have demonstrated differences in intrinsic catalytic activity, dependence on conserved regulatory subunits, and the relative production of H3K4me1, H3K4me2, and H3K4me3 [37]. Thus, although H3K4 is a conserved substrate across species, the relative contributions of individual COMPASS-family complexes to different methylation states and genomic regions have diversified during evolution. These differences may contribute to the distinct developmental functions and neurodevelopmental phenotypes associated with mutations in individual SETD1/KMT2 family members.

Although all six members of the mammalian SETD1/KMT2 H3K4 methyltransferase family have been implicated in human developmental disease, pathogenic variants in these genes give rise to overlapping yet distinct phenotypic spectra (Table 1). SETD1A haploinsufficiency is associated with developmental delay or intellectual disability, prominent speech and language difficulties, behavioral abnormalities, and variable epilepsy [38] (OMIM# 619056). Setd1a-deficient mice exhibit working-memory impairment accompanied by reduced axonal branching and abnormalities in cortical synaptic dynamics [39]. Independent studies have also identified impaired excitatory synaptic function and schizophrenia-related behavioral abnormalities [40]. Genomic analyses demonstrated that SETD1A occupies both promoters and enhancers, with substantial overlap between SETD1A and the neuronal transcription factor MEF2 at enhancer regions [39]. SETD1A target genes are highly expressed in cortical pyramidal neurons and exhibit a complex combination of increased and decreased expression following Setd1a deficiency, consistent with distinct regulatory functions of SETD1A at promoters and MEF2-associated enhancers. Evolutionarily conserved SETD1A targets are also enriched for genes carrying neuropsychiatric genetic risk, providing a molecular connection between SETD1A-dependent transcription and disease susceptibility. Importantly, restoring Setd1a expression in adulthood ameliorates working-memory deficits, while inhibition of the counteracting lysine demethylase LSD1 rescues both behavioral and morphological abnormalities [39].

SETD1B-related NDD is characterized by developmental and language delay, ID, autism or other behavioral difficulties, and heterogeneous epilepsy phenotypes [41] (OMIM#619000) (Table 1). Developmental impairment can precede seizure onset, indicating that the cognitive phenotype cannot be attributed solely to epileptic activity. Conditional deletion of Setd1b in excitatory neurons of the postnatal forebrain causes severe impairments in hippocampus-dependent learning and spatial memory [69]. Neuron-specific ChIP-seq and RNA-seq demonstrated that Setd1b loss preferentially reduces H3K4me3 at promoters characterized by broad H3K4me3 domains and decreases expression of highly expressed neuron-enriched genes involved in synaptic plasticity, learning, and memory [69]. Comparison with Kmt2a- and Kmt2b-deficient mice (discussed below) further showed that SETD1B exerts a particularly strong influence on this class of neuronal genes. These observations indicate that SETD1A/SETD1B are not merely required to establish developmental transcriptional programs but continuously maintain a specialized epigenetic state necessary for mature neuronal function.

Heterozygous pathogenic variants in KMT2A cause Wiedemann–Steiner syndrome (OMIM#605130), characterized by developmental delay, variable intellectual disability, speech impairment, and hypotonia, often accompanied by hypertrichosis, short stature, feeding difficulties, and distinctive facial features [42,43] (Table 1). KMT2B-related disease (OMIM#617284, 619934) encompasses both childhood-onset progressive dystonia and a broader neurodevelopmental phenotype. Dystonia frequently begins in the lower limbs and subsequently generalizes, with prominent cranial and laryngeal involvement. Developmental delay, intellectual disability, microcephaly, and growth restriction may coexist, whereas some individuals present with developmental abnormalities without dystonia [44] (Table 1). Conditional depletion of either Kmt2a or Kmt2b in forebrain neurons impairs memory, but comparative ChIP-seq and RNA-seq analyses revealed that the two enzymes predominantly regulate distinct genomic regions and molecular pathways associated with neuronal plasticity [70,71]. Thus, apparently similar cognitive phenotypes can arise from disruption of different transcriptional networks. More recently, a genetically rescuable heterozygous Kmt2a model reproduced growth and craniofacial abnormalities together with hippocampal memory impairment [72]. Restoration of KMT2A during embryonic development rescued neurological phenotypes, supporting an important developmental contribution to disease pathogenesis [72]. The relationship between human and mouse phenotypes also illustrates an important limitation of cross-species modeling. Although developmental and cognitive abnormalities observed in Kmt2a- and Kmt2b-deficient mice correspond broadly to the neurodevelopmental manifestations of the respective human disorders, these models do not necessarily reproduce their complete clinical spectra. In particular, the forebrain Kmt2b models described above predominantly exhibit cognitive abnormalities rather than the progressive dystonia that represents a major manifestation of KMT2B-related disease. Such discrepancies may reflect species-specific developmental requirements, compensatory mechanisms, or differences between the molecular consequences of experimental loss-of-function alleles and those of individual human pathogenic variants.

Heterozygous loss-of-function variants in KMT2C cause a variable disorder involving developmental delay, intellectual disability, language impairment, and behavioral or psychiatric difficulties, with autism and seizures in a subset of individuals [45] (Table 1). Although historically designated Kleefstra syndrome type 2 (OMIM#617768) [73], recent clinical and DNA-methylation analyses support recognition of KMT2C-related NDD as distinct from Kleefstra syndromes [45]. By contrast, heterozygous loss-of-function variants in KMT2D are the cause of Kabuki syndrome type 1 (OMIM#147920), in which developmental delay and commonly mild-to-moderate intellectual disability occur alongside characteristic facial features, persistent fingertip pads, skeletal abnormalities, postnatal growth deficiency, and variable cardiac, auditory, and immune abnormalities [46,47,48] (Table 1). Interestingly, selected missense variants in a restricted region of KMT2D produce a multiple-malformation disorder distinct from typical Kabuki syndrome [74], illustrating the importance of variant location and mechanism. Mice carrying a heterozygous mutation in Kmt2c exhibit memory deficits and other autism spectrum disorder-related abnormalities [75]. Bulk-brain RNA-seq revealed enrichment of autism spectrum disorder-risk genes among upregulated transcripts, whereas genomic KMT2C-binding sites were preferentially associated with downregulated genes [75], suggesting that both direct and indirect transcriptional consequences contribute to the phenotype. Single-cell RNA-seq of neonatal brains further localized strong autism spectrum disorder-associated transcriptional abnormalities to radial glial cells and immature neurons despite the absence of major changes in overall cellular composition [75]. Similar to Setd1a mutant mice [39], treatment of adult Kmt2c mutant mice with an LSD1 inhibitor improves social behavior and shifts the majority of altered transcripts toward wild-type expression levels [75]. Heterozygous Kmt2d mutant mice exhibit reduced H3K4me3 in the dentate gyrus, impaired adult hippocampal neurogenesis, and deficits in hippocampus-dependent memory [76,77]. Treatment with either a histone deacetylase inhibitor or an LSD1 inhibitor restores aspects of chromatin accessibility, improves neurogenesis, and ameliorates memory impairment [76,77]. Although these studies do not compare the gene-expression changes in Kmt2d mutant mice with those of other KMT2-family mutant mice, they support a mechanistic sequence in which KMT2D haploinsufficiency alters chromatin regulation, thereby compromising the functional integration of newly generated hippocampal neurons. These findings also illustrate an important aspect of cross-species convergence. Intellectual disability and learning difficulties associated with SETD1A-, KMT2C-, and KMT2D-related disorders are paralleled by impairments in learning, memory, behavioral flexibility, or social behavior in corresponding mouse models. However, similar behavioral outcomes do not necessarily indicate equivalent underlying mechanisms. Working-memory impairment in Setd1a-deficient mice is associated with abnormalities in cortical axonal branching and synaptic dynamics, whereas cognitive dysfunction in Kmt2d mutants is closely associated with impaired adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Moreover, the improvement of behavioral and molecular abnormalities following restoration of SETD1A activity or pharmacological modulation of LSD1 or histone deacetylases suggests that at least some consequences of disrupted chromatin regulation remain functionally modifiable beyond early development. Nevertheless, rescue of selected phenotypes in mice should not be interpreted as evidence that corresponding clinical manifestations are necessarily reversible in affected individuals.

KMT2E (also known as MLL5) requires separate consideration. Although its nomenclature places it within the KMT2 family, KMT2E is not one of the six canonical catalytic SET1/COMPASS methyltransferases. KMT2E contains a PHD finger and a structurally divergent SET domain. Structural and biochemical analyses have identified alterations in regions required for substrate and cofactor accommodation and have failed to detect intrinsic methyltransferase activity under the conditions examined. KMT2E therefore illustrates that the presence of a SET domain—or classification within a methyltransferase-related gene family—is not, by itself, sufficient to establish enzymatic activity [17,18]. Heterozygous loss-of-function variants in the KMT2E gene cause O’Donnell–Luria–Rodan syndrome (OMIM#618512), characterized primarily by developmental delay/intellectual disability, speech delay, hypotonia, macrocephaly, and variable autism and epilepsy [49,50] (Table 1). Most pathogenic variants are truncating and are consistent with haploinsufficiency, whereas some missense variants are associated with a more severe phenotype including microcephaly and developmental and epileptic encephalopathy [49,50]. Kmt2e heterozygous mice exhibit impaired social behavior and increased anxiety-like behavior, accompanied by altered glucose metabolism and neuronal development in the amygdala [78]. More recent studies further demonstrated that Kmt2e haploinsufficiency impairs microglial phagocytosis and synaptic clearance through dysregulation of TREM2-SGK3-GSK3β signaling, resulting in neuronal hyperexcitability and autism spectrum disorder-like behaviors [79]. These findings provide experimental support for the neurodevelopmental consequences of KMT2E haploinsufficiency observed in humans.

SETD5 represents another structurally unusual member of the SET domain protein family and is particularly relevant to NDDs. SETD5 is evolutionarily related to KMT2E and contains an N-terminal SET domain together with additional regions implicated in transcriptional regulation and protein–protein interactions [80]. Although SETD5 has been implicated in the regulation of H3K36 methylation [81], its intrinsic catalytic activity remains uncertain [18,82,83]. Instead, biochemical and functional evidence indicates that at least some of its effects on chromatin and transcription are mediated through noncatalytic mechanisms, including interactions with chromatin-regulatory complexes such as HDAC3-containing corepressor machinery [80]. Thus, similar to KMT2E, SETD5 exemplifies how SET domain-containing proteins can exert substantial regulatory effects on chromatin and transcription independently of demonstrable intrinsic methyltransferase activity. Haploinsufficiency of SETD5 causes a variably expressed NDD involving intellectual disability, speech and motor delay, hypotonia, and behavioral abnormalities, including autistic features in some individuals [51,52] (OMIM#615761) (Table 1). Dysmorphism, feeding difficulties, and congenital anomalies also occur [84,85]. Setd5 heterozygous mice display cognitive impairment, behavioral inflexibility, altered ultrasonic vocalizations, hyperactivity, and abnormalities in social behavior, although the precise phenotype varies among models [81,82,86,87]. Transcriptomic analysis of the developing Setd5 mutant cortex identified altered expression of neurodevelopment-related genes in specific neuronal populations, accompanied by reduced neurite outgrowth, decreased synaptic density, impaired network activity, and abnormalities in deep-layer cortical neuron development [86]. Other studies have linked SETD5 deficiency to altered transcriptional elongation and RNA maturation, resulting in aberrant gene expression and splicing during neural development [81]. An additional mechanism involves ribosome biogenesis: RNA-seq of Setd5 mutant brains revealed preferential reduction in ribosomal protein genes, while rDNA transcription, global translational activity, cyclin D1 translation, and neural-cell proliferation were impaired by SETD5 insufficiency [87]. SETD5 was shown in this context to regulate rDNA chromatin through recruitment of an HDAC3-containing complex. Thus, SETD5 deficiency may disturb neurodevelopment through several interconnected processes, including transcriptional fidelity, ribosome biogenesis, protein synthesis, neural progenitor proliferation, and neuronal network formation. At the phenotypic level, cognitive impairment, behavioral inflexibility, abnormalities in social behavior, and altered ultrasonic vocalizations in Setd5-deficient mice parallel selected cognitive, behavioral, and communication-related manifestations of SETD5-associated NDD [52].

Taken together, the SETD1/KMT2-related proteins demonstrate particularly strong cross-species convergence in cognitive function. Human disorders caused by pathogenic variants in SETD1A, SETD1B, KMT2A, KMT2C, KMT2D, KMT2E, and SETD5 commonly involve intellectual or developmental impairment, whereas corresponding mouse models frequently exhibit abnormalities in learning, memory, behavioral flexibility, social behavior, or neuronal communication. Importantly, however, this phenotypic convergence occurs despite substantial mechanistic diversity, ranging from altered enhancer and promoter regulation to impaired adult neurogenesis, ribosome biogenesis, synaptic function, and microglial regulation. Cross-species correspondence is therefore generally strongest at the level of affected neurobiological functions rather than complete clinical syndromes.

3. SETD2/NSD/ASH1L Family

Proteins catalyzing H3K36 methylation include SETD2, NSD1, NSD2, NSD3, and ASH1L (Figure 4). NSD family proteins contain multiple chromatin-interaction modules, including PWWP and PHD domains, surrounding an AWS–SET–post-SET catalytic region. Structural studies of NSD2 and NSD3 bound to nucleosomes have demonstrated that substrate recognition involves rearrangement of nucleosomal DNA and precise positioning of the catalytic domain relative to histone H3, highlighting the importance of nucleosome architecture in regulating their enzymatic activity [88]. ASH1L similarly contains an AWS–SET–post-SET catalytic region, together with a bromodomain, a PHD finger, and a BAH domain. Its catalytic activity is constrained by an autoinhibitory loop that restricts substrate access to the active site. Direct interaction with MRG15 can relieve this autoinhibition by displacing the regulatory loop, thereby enhancing ASH1L-mediated H3K36 methylation [89]. SETD2, by contrast, is distinguished by its close coupling to transcription and its predominant role in catalyzing H3K36 trimethylation. Its conserved Set2–Rpb1 interaction (SRI) domain mediates association with RNA polymerase II, illustrating how accessory domains can couple histone methyltransferase activity to specific cellular processes such as transcriptional elongation [90]. Through its SRI and SET domains, SETD2 also catalyzes the methylation of α-tubulin at lysine 40, thereby contributing to microtubule stabilization [91,92] (Figure 1 and Figure 4).

Pathogenic variants in SETD2 are associated with a spectrum of autosomal dominant neurodevelopmental disorders, including Luscan–Lumish syndrome (LLS) (OMIM#616831), Rabin–Pappas syndrome (RPS) (OMIM#620155), and intellectual developmental disorder, autosomal dominant 70 (MRD70) (OMIM#620157) (Table 1). LLS is primarily associated with heterozygous loss-of-function variants and is characterized by developmental delay, intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, macrocephaly, and variable generalized overgrowth [53,54]. In contrast, RPS, most commonly associated with the recurrent missense variant p.Arg1740Trp, manifests as a more severe disorder characterized by profound intellectual disability, microcephaly, growth restriction, and multiple congenital anomalies [55]. Additional missense variants, including p.Glu1718Lys and p.Asp2251Glu, have also been reported in individuals with RPS-like phenotypes [93]. Notably, the p.Arg1740Gln variant is associated with MRD70, which is characterized by intellectual disability and speech impairment without the pronounced growth abnormalities or multiple congenital anomalies typically observed in RPS [55]. Although these disorders share neurodevelopmental impairments, their distinctive clinical presentations and DNA methylation profiles suggest variant-specific effects on SETD2-mediated epigenetic regulation. Together, these findings highlight the complex genotype–phenotype relationships associated with SETD2 dysfunction. Conditional deletion of Setd2 in the developing dorsal forebrain disrupts cortical arealization and cortico-thalamo-cortical circuit formation, resulting in impaired social interaction, motor learning, and spatial memory [94]. Loss of SETD2-dependent H3K36me3 alters developmental transcription, including reduced expression of clustered protocadherin genes, providing a plausible link between chromatin dysregulation, neuronal recognition and connectivity, and abnormal circuit formation [94]. In contrast, a heterozygous Setd2 SRI-domain missense model selectively disrupts SETD2-dependent α-tubulin methylation while preserving histone H3K36 methylation. These animals exhibit anxiety-like behavior and primary neurons show reduced axonal length and abnormal dendritic arborization, yet RNA-seq and ChIP-seq detect no substantial accompanying changes in gene expression or chromatin methylation [95]. This model is particularly informative because it demonstrates that SETD2-associated neurobehavioral phenotypes can arise through a non-histone cytoskeletal mechanism independently of detectable transcriptional dysregulation. The marked genotype-dependent clinical heterogeneity of SETD2-related disorders is particularly important when interpreting these mouse models.

Heterozygous NSD1 variants or deletions cause Sotos syndrome, in which learning difficulties or intellectual disability accompany macrocephaly, overgrowth, advanced bone age, and characteristic facial features [56] (OMIM# 117550) (Table 1). Nsd1 heterozygous mice exhibit reduced social-novelty preference and decreased pup ultrasonic vocalizations but do not reproduce the generalized somatic or brain overgrowth characteristic of human Sotos syndrome [96]. More mechanistically informative results have emerged from conditional Nsd1 deletion in the neocortex. Loss of Nsd1 shifts the boundaries of cortical functional areas, disrupts cortico-thalamo-cortical connectivity, and produces deficits in spatial memory, motor learning, and motor coordination [97]. At the molecular level, Nsd1 loss causes widespread depletion of H3K36me2 and redistribution of DNA methylation. Superficial-layer pyramidal neurons progressively misexpress deep-layer neuronal markers and fail to achieve normal morphological and electrophysiological maturation [97]. Expression of neocortical layer-specifying genes is reduced, whereas normally silenced non-neural genes become ectopically expressed [97]. NSD1-dependent H3K36me2 therefore appears to stabilize region- and layer-specific transcriptional identities, providing a direct connection between chromatin organization, neuronal identity, circuit assembly, and behavior.

NSD2 deficiency causes Rauch–Steindl syndrome, typically involving prenatal and postnatal growth restriction, speech and motor delay, and variable, often relatively mild, intellectual impairment [57,58] (OMIM #619695) (Table 1). Although NSD2 lies within the chromosome 4p16.3 region deleted in Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome, characterized by typical facial appearance, intellectual disability, hypotonia, growth delay and seizures [98] (OMIM#194190), isolated NSD2 deficiency constitutes a distinct disorder [99,100,101]. Conditional deletion of Nsd2 in the developing neocortex markedly impairs astrocyte production during late embryogenesis and subsequently causes learning and memory deficits [102]. Integrated epigenomic and transcriptomic analyses showed that NSD2 deposits H3K36me2 at the Egfr promoter, thereby maintaining Egfr expression and downstream ERK signaling during the neurogenic-to-gliogenic transition [102]. Pharmacological restoration of ERK activity rescues astrocyte-production defects both in vitro and in vivo [102]. These findings establish an NSD2–H3K36me2–EGFR–ERK pathway linking chromatin regulation to glial differentiation and demonstrate that NDD-associated SETD proteins can influence cognition through abnormalities in non-neuronal as well as neuronal lineages.

Pathogenic ASH1L variants similarly cause a broad syndromic NDD characterized by developmental delay, intellectual disability, substantial speech impairment, and variable autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, seizures, and sleep disturbances [59] (OMIM#617796) (Table 1). Ash1l haploinsufficiency models identify abnormal synaptic remodeling as an important downstream mechanism [103]. Ash1l mutant mice exhibit altered social behavior, repetitive behavior, anxiety-related phenotypes, and impaired discrimination associated with excessive synapse formation and defective activity-dependent synapse pruning [103]. In these mice, EphA7 expression is reduced through increased EZH2-dependent H3K27me3 across the EphA7 locus. Activation of EphA7 signaling with ephrin-A5 improves synapse pruning and rescues discrimination deficits [103], providing direct evidence linking an epigenetically dysregulated target gene to a neuronal and behavioral phenotype. The social and repetitive behavioral abnormalities observed in Ash1l-deficient mice correspond broadly to behavioral manifestations reported in individuals with ASH1L-related NDD. Conditional deletion of Ash1l in the developing nervous system also produces delayed brain development together with autism spectrum disorder-related abnormalities [104]. RNA-seq during neural progenitor differentiation demonstrated that Ash1l loss impairs the normal induction of genes involved in brain development and intercellular communication while also dysregulating genes involved in migration and growth [104]. These findings suggest that not only abnormal synaptic pruning but also failure to establish appropriate developmental transcriptional programs contributes to the behavioral phenotype.

4. SUV39/EHMT/SETDB Family

Human methyltransferases targeting H3K9, which are evolutionarily related to Drosophila Suppressor of variegation 3–9, include SUV39H1, SUV39H2, EHMT1 (also known as GLP), EHMT2 (also known as G9a), SETDB1, and SETDB2. These proteins constitute distinct evolutionary branches characterized by different accessory-domain architectures [105,106,107] (Figure 5). SUV39 proteins (SUV39H1 and SUV39H2) contain chromodomains, whereas EHMT proteins (EHMT1 and EHMT2) possess ankyrin repeats in addition to their catalytic SET domains. SETDB proteins (SETDB1 and SETDB2) are distinguished by the presence of MBDs. These differences in domain architecture provide mechanisms for directing related H3K9 methyltransferase activities toward distinct chromatin contexts and regulatory pathways. Notably, the ankyrin repeats of EHMT1 and EHMT2 recognize mono- and dimethylated H3K9, enabling these enzymes to couple catalytic activity with recognition of their methylated products and thereby facilitating the establishment and propagation of repressive chromatin states [108].

Among H3K9 methyltransferases, heterozygous loss-of-function variants in EHMT1 cause Kleefstra syndrome (OMIM# 610253). Its principal features include intellectual disability, markedly impaired expressive speech, childhood hypotonia, and a recognizable facial appearance, with variable autistic behaviors, epilepsy, sleep disturbances, and congenital abnormalities [60,61] (Table 1). Recent evidence has extended this group with de novo heterozygous EHMT2 variants reported in 2026 in individuals with a Kleefstra-like developmental syndrome and functionally impaired methyltransferase activity [62] (Table 1). Biallelic cases have also been described [109], although the recessive presentation and the relationship between inheritance pattern and molecular mechanism remain less extensively characterized. Ehmt1 heterozygous mice exhibit learning and memory abnormalities accompanied by reduced dendritic arborization, decreased mature spine density, and altered hippocampal excitatory neurotransmission [110]. Although this model has not been subjected to the same depth of genome-wide neuronal transcriptomic analysis as some H3K4 methyltransferase models, studies of the closely interacting EHMT1/EHMT2 complex have provided important mechanistic insight. Postnatal neuron-specific deletion of Ehmt1 and Ehmt2 causes learning, motivational, and adaptive-behavior abnormalities associated with widespread derepression of genes normally characteristic of non-neuronal cells and neuronal progenitors [111]. These findings indicate that H3K9me2-mediated repression is continuously required in mature neurons to prevent inappropriate reactivation of alternative cellular programs. Thus, EHMT1/EHMT2-dependent maintenance of transcriptional identity represents a plausible mechanism linking reduced H3K9 methylation to cognitive dysfunction. The intellectual and learning impairment characteristic of Kleefstra syndrome is broadly paralleled by learning and memory abnormalities in Ehmt1 heterozygous mice. At the mechanistic level, however, these behavioral abnormalities are associated with reduced dendritic arborization, decreased mature spine density, and altered hippocampal excitatory neurotransmission [110], emphasizing that cross-species correspondence is most appropriately interpreted at the level of affected cognitive and neuronal functions rather than as direct equivalence between human intellectual disability and performance in individual mouse behavioral tasks. Together with observations from Setd1a- and Kmt2d-deficient mice, these findings further demonstrate that apparently similar cognitive outcomes can arise through distinct cellular and molecular pathways.

5. EZH Family

The Enhancer-of-zeste family, represented in humans by EZH1 and EZH2, catalyzes H3K27 methylation as the catalytic component of Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) [112,113] (Figure 6). The architecture of these proteins underscores the functional importance of interactions extending beyond the SET domain itself. Structural analyses of PRC2 have demonstrated that assembly with regulatory partners, including EED and SUZ12, is required to organize and activate the EZH2 catalytic region [114].

In EZH1, both heterozygous gain-of-function missense variants and biallelic loss-of-function variants cause NDDs with overlapping developmental and speech impairment [63] (Table 1). In cortical neuron differentiation model of human stem cells, EZH1 variation alters neuronal differentiation, with EZH1 loss of function enriching progenitor stages and EZH1 gain of function favoring features of differentiated neurons [63]. In contrast, Ezh1 deletion in mice does not produce overt cellular or molecular brain abnormalities and neurological defects [115]. Thus, despite evidence from human neural models demonstrating an important role for EZH1 in neurogenesis, loss of Ezh1 alone appears to produce relatively subtle neurological consequences in mice, potentially reflecting species-specific requirements or functional compensation by EZH2. Interpretation of this discrepancy also requires consideration of variant mechanism. Human EZH1-related NDD can result from both heterozygous gain-of-function variants and biallelic loss-of-function variants, whereas conventional Ezh1 deletion models primarily address the consequences of loss of gene function. To the best of our knowledge, corresponding disease-associated EZH1 gain-of-function variants have not yet been characterized in mouse models.

Heterozygous missense variants in EZH2 cause Weaver syndrome (OMIM#277590), characterized by overgrowth, advanced bone age, distinctive facial features, camptodactyly, and variable developmental or intellectual impairment [64,65] (Table 1). Functional studies support dominant-negative effects for examined Weaver-associated variants [116]. Loss of EZH2 from early postmitotic neurons delays neuronal migration, increases dendritic complexity and spine density, disrupts synaptic plasticity, and impairs multiple forms of memory [117]. RNA-seq identified extensive transcriptional dysregulation, with affected genes enriched for neuronal migration, neuron projection morphogenesis, differentiation, synapse organization, and dendritic development. Among these targets, Pak3 and Bdnf are upregulated following Ezh2 deletion [117]. PAK3 was further identified as a direct H3K27me3-regulated target, and inhibition of PAK3 function reverses the increased dendritic spine density caused by Ezh2 loss. These findings establish a direct mechanistic link between loss of Polycomb-mediated transcriptional repression, inappropriate expression of a neuronal morphogenesis regulator, and altered neuronal structure.

6. KMT5 Family

The H4K20 methyltransferases provide another example of a substrate-based grouping comprising evolutionarily and structurally distinct enzyme families (Figure 7). KMT5A, also known as SETD8 or PR-Set7, primarily catalyzes H4K20 monomethylation, whereas KMT5B (also known as SUV420H1) and KMT5C (also known as SUV420H2) predominantly contribute to the generation of higher H4K20 methylation states [118]. Structural studies of SUV420 enzymes (KMT5B and KMT5C) have revealed specialized interactions with histone H4 and the nucleosome that facilitate substrate recognition and precise positioning of the catalytic machinery [119,120]. Thus, the functional specificity of H4K20 methyltransferases is determined not only by the catalytic properties of their active sites but also by their ability to recognize and engage the surrounding chromatin environment.

Exome sequencing of more than four thousand families containing individuals with undiagnosed developmental disorders found that only one individual carried a de novo synonymous variant in KMT5C and no de novo mutations in KMT5A [121]. Subsequent case studies of patients with cerebellar tonsillar herniation or autism spectrum disorder reported missense mutations in KMT5A [122,123]. However, no constitutional KMT5A- or KMT5C-related disorder had yet been established. In contrast, there is clear evidence that pathogenic heterozygous variants in KMT5B, including loss-of-function and missense variants, cause intellectual developmental disorder, autosomal dominant 51, characterized by developmental delay, intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, and speech impairment [66,67] (MRD51, OMIM# 617788) (Table 1). Macrocephaly and variable overgrowth are prominent clinical features. Notably, expanded clinical characterization has identified hypotonia, joint hypermobility, congenital heart defects, and other malformations as additional components of the phenotype. Although most pathogenic variants occur de novo, familial transmission has also been documented. These findings highlight the contribution of KMT5B-mediated chromatin regulation to both neurodevelopment and systemic organ development [68] (Table 1). Kmt5b haploinsufficient models exhibit developmental growth abnormalities, reduced muscle mass and neuromuscular strength, and defects relevant to the hypotonia and motor delay observed in individuals with KMT5B-associated NDDs [124]. Additional experimental models demonstrate impaired neural progenitor proliferation, accelerated neuronal migration, reduced dendritic complexity, and altered dendritic spine density following KMT5B reduction [125]. Importantly, RNA-seq of Kmt5b-haploinsufficient mouse brains identified dysregulated pathways involved in nervous-system development and function, including axon-guidance signaling [68]. These findings suggest that altered developmental transcription contributes alongside peripheral neuromuscular abnormalities to the phenotype associated with KMT5B haploinsufficiency. The correspondence between the human and mouse phenotypes is therefore evident across several functional domains: developmental and motor impairment in affected individuals is accompanied by abnormalities in neural progenitor proliferation, neuronal migration, dendritic maturation, and neuromuscular function in experimental models.

7. SETD3

SETD3 provides a particularly informative example of a SETD protein that targets a non-histone substrate. Biochemical and structural studies have established that SETD3 catalyzes the methylation of histidine 73 in β- and γ-actins [126,127,128] (Figure 1). This discovery expands the biochemical repertoire of SETD proteins beyond lysine methylation and underscores the importance of experimentally validating substrate specificity rather than inferring enzymatic activity solely from domain architecture. Together with catalytically inactive proteins such as KMT2E, SETD3 illustrates how the conserved SET scaffold has undergone substantial functional diversification, encompassing both altered substrate and amino acid specificity and divergence from canonical histone lysine methyltransferase activity. At present, SETD3 is not an established monogenic neurodevelopmental disorder gene. However, specific pathogenic variants in actin genes are associated with Baraitser–Winter cerebrofrontofacial syndrome (BRWS) (OMIM#243310, #614583), characterized by developmental delay and intellectual disability of variable severity, frequently accompanied by frontal-predominant pachygyria or other cortical malformations, epilepsy, and progressive microcephaly [129,130]. There are two types of BRWS: type 1 (BRWS1) generally exhibits more pronounced craniofacial abnormalities and a broader spectrum of congenital malformations (OMIM#243310), whereas type 2 (BRWS2) tends to present with milder facial dysmorphism but a higher frequency of neuronal migration abnormalities, particularly pachygyria (#614583). Specifically, the ACTB gene encoding β-actin is mutated in BRWS1, while the ACTG1 gene encoding γ-actin is mutated in BRWS2. These mutations affect residues within the SETD3–actin interaction interface, suggesting a potential mechanistic link between SETD3-mediated actin regulation and NDD pathogenesis [131]. However, disease-associated actin variants have not yet been shown to produce a well-established Baraitser–Winter cerebrofrontofacial syndrome phenotype in mouse models, and a direct relationship between SETD3-dependent actin methylation and the neurological manifestations of Baraitser–Winter cerebrofrontofacial syndrome remains to be established. Consequently, unlike several other SETD protein families discussed above, a robust human–mouse genotype–phenotype correspondence cannot yet be defined for SETD3-dependent actin regulation.

8. Discussion

Pathogenic variants in SETD genes cause a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations, ranging from relatively mild developmental and behavioral abnormalities to severe syndromic disorders characterized by developmental delay, intellectual disability, speech and language impairment, autism spectrum disorder-related features, epilepsy, growth abnormalities, and congenital anomalies. Although SETD proteins share a conserved catalytic domain, they differ markedly in their histone substrates, domain architecture, interacting partners, genomic targets, and biological functions. The phenotypic overlap among disorders caused by disruption of these functionally diverse proteins therefore highlights the sensitivity of human neurodevelopment to disturbances in epigenetic and transcriptional regulation.

The clinical consequences of SETD gene variants can differ substantially, even among variants affecting the same gene. For example, pathogenic SETD2 variants have been associated with Luscan–Lumish syndrome (OMIM #616831) and Rabin–Pappas syndrome (OMIM #620155). Although these conditions share neurodevelopmental impairments, they exhibit distinct clinical manifestations, particularly regarding growth abnormalities and congenital anomalies. Luscan–Lumish syndrome is commonly associated with macrocephaly and overgrowth, whereas Rabin–Pappas syndrome is characterized by microcephaly, severe developmental impairment, and multiple congenital anomalies. These differences highlight the importance of considering variant-specific molecular effects when interpreting genotype–phenotype relationships. Similarly, pathogenic variants in KMT5B cause a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by intellectual disability, developmental delay, speech impairment, and variable autism-related features. Expanded clinical characterization has further identified congenital heart defects and other structural malformations as additional components of the KMT5B-associated phenotype, underscoring its broader clinical heterogeneity.

Studies using genetically modified mice have substantially advanced our understanding of the roles of SETD proteins in nervous system development. Across multiple models, abnormalities in neural progenitor function, neuronal differentiation and maturation, learning and memory, social behavior, synaptic function, and neuronal excitability have been reported. Comparison with human phenotypes reveals substantial conservation in several neurodevelopmental domains, supporting the utility of mouse models for mechanistic studies. However, as illustrated by the absence of generalized overgrowth in Nsd1 heterozygous mice [96] and the limited recapitulation of progressive dystonia in forebrain-specific Kmt2b models [70], some genetically relevant models may reproduce only selected functional dimensions of the corresponding human disorder. Mouse models should therefore be viewed not as complete replicas of human disorders but as experimental systems for identifying conserved biological consequences of SETD protein dysfunction.

Although deletion of genes is easily linked to loss of function, missense variants require careful functional characterization because they may result in loss-of-function, gain-of-function, dominant-negative, or more selective domain- or substrate-specific effects. The examples of SETD2, EZH1, and EZH2 discussed above illustrate this principle [63,94,95,116,117]: disease-associated variants within the same gene can produce molecular consequences that differ substantially from those generated by simple gene deletion. Moreover, the SETD2 SRI-domain mutant demonstrates that neurobehavioral abnormalities can arise through impaired methylation of a non-histone substrate, α-tubulin, even in the absence of prominent alterations in H3K36 methylation or gene expression [95]. Integrating human genetic data with biochemical, epigenomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and cellular analyses will therefore be essential for establishing robust genotype–molecular phenotype–clinical phenotype relationships.

An important challenge for future studies is whether genetically distinct SETD-related NDDs converge on common molecular pathways. The overlapping clinical phenotypes observed across these disorders are unlikely to result from a uniform alteration in histone methylation because individual SETD proteins target different histone residues and can exert opposing effects on transcription. Instead, distinct epigenetic abnormalities may converge on neurodevelopmentally critical gene networks and cellular processes. The mechanistic studies summarized above support this concept while also emphasizing substantial gene-specificity. For example, NSD1-dependent H3K36me2 contributes to maintenance of cortical neuronal identity [97], NSD2 regulates gliogenic differentiation through an H3K36me2–EGFR–ERK pathway [102], and ASH1L influences activity-dependent synaptic remodeling in part through regulation of EphA7 [103,104]. SETD5 deficiency, by contrast, affects not only transcriptional regulation but also ribosome biogenesis and global protein synthesis [81,82,86,87]. Thus, convergence among SETD-related NDDs may occur at the level of cellular functions even when the upstream molecular pathways are distinct. Comparative analyses across different SETD genes at the transcriptomic, epigenomic, translatomic, and proteomic levels will be important for identifying such shared pathways and distinguishing them from gene-specific mechanisms.

To systematically investigate the functional relationships among SETD proteins discussed in this review, we performed Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis using the GO Biological Process database (Figure 8). The five highest-ranking enriched terms were methylation (GO:0032259), chromatin remodeling (GO:0006338), chromatin organization (GO:0006325), DNA-templated transcription (GO:0006351), and cellular component organization (GO:0016043). These findings are consistent with the established roles of SETD proteins in epigenetic regulation, chromatin organization, and transcriptional control. Notably, the enrichment of these functionally related biological processes suggests that SETD proteins may contribute to common regulatory networks despite their differences in substrate specificity, catalytic activity, and molecular functions. However, because these proteins were selected based on their SET domains and relevance to NDDs, the observed enrichment should be interpreted cautiously and does not necessarily indicate convergence on identical downstream molecular pathways. Nevertheless, these findings provide a functional framework for understanding how disruption of distinct SETD proteins may contribute to overlapping neurodevelopmental phenotypes.

An additional perspective on cross-gene convergence emerges from the contrasting growth phenotypes associated with SETD-related disorders. Pathogenic variants in NSD1, SETD2, EZH2, and KMT2E are associated with overgrowth and/or macrocephaly [49,50,56,64,65], whereas NSD2 deficiency is associated with growth restriction [57,58] and the SETD2 p.Arg1740Trp variant causes a distinct disorder characterized by microcephaly [55]. These observations suggest that SETD proteins participate in regulatory pathways controlling developmental growth, although disruption of individual components can produce opposing phenotypic consequences. One potential molecular framework involves the interplay between H3K36 methylation, DNA methylation, and PRC2-mediated H3K27 methylation. H3K36me2 and H3K36me3 contribute to the recruitment and genomic distribution of DNA methyltransferases DNMT3A and DNMT3B, respectively [132,133,134,135], while H3K36 methylation antagonizes PRC2-mediated H3K27 methylation [13,136]. Consequently, alterations in H3K36 methylation may influence both DNA methylation patterns and Polycomb-dependent transcriptional repression, potentially affecting developmental gene-expression programs that regulate cellular proliferation and differentiation. However, the precise contribution of these interactions to the opposing growth phenotypes observed in individual SETD-related disorders remains to be established.

The functional relationship between H3K36 and H3K27 methylation is also relevant to neuronal development. As discussed above, ASH1L deficiency increases EZH2-dependent H3K27me3 at the EphA7 locus, resulting in reduced EphA7 expression and impaired activity-dependent synaptic pruning [103]. This finding provides an example of how disruption of an H3K36 methyltransferase-associated regulatory pathway can alter PRC2-mediated transcriptional repression and downstream neuronal function. Together with the developmental abnormalities associated with NSD1, NSD2, SETD2, and EZH2 dysfunction, these observations suggest that interactions among histone methylation pathways may represent an important level of molecular convergence.

DNA methylation episignatures provide another complementary framework for investigating convergence and divergence among SETD-related NDDs [137]. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling has identified characteristic episignatures in several disorders caused by pathogenic variants in chromatin-regulatory genes, including SETD-related disorders such as those associated with KMT2C, NSD1, and EZH2 [45,138,139]. These profiles reflect reproducible alterations in DNA methylation patterns and may provide molecular biomarkers for variant interpretation and disease classification [140]. Integrating DNA methylation profiling with histone modification maps, transcriptomic analyses, and functional studies in patient-derived neural models will therefore be important for establishing the biological significance of these molecular relationships.

The developmental timing and cellular context of SETD dysfunction also remain important areas for investigation. Conditional and inducible animal models will help define the neural cell populations and developmental periods in which individual SETD proteins are required. Studies discussed above indicate that SETD proteins can act at markedly different developmental and cellular stages, ranging from regulation of neural progenitor differentiation and cortical arealization to maintenance of transcriptional identity and synaptic function in mature neurons. The contribution of non-neuronal cell types should also receive greater attention, as illustrated by the requirement for NSD2 in astrocyte production [102] and the reported effects of KMT2E haploinsufficiency on microglial phagocytosis and synaptic clearance [79]. Such findings suggest that SETD-related NDDs may arise not only from neuron-intrinsic abnormalities but also from disruption of interactions among multiple neural cell types.

Of particular therapeutic relevance is whether neurological phenotypes caused by SETD protein dysfunction become irreversibly established during embryonic development or remain dependent on ongoing molecular abnormalities in the postnatal or adult brain. The studies summarized here provide several encouraging examples of functional reversibility. Restoration of Setd1a expression in adulthood improves working-memory deficits [39], whereas developmental restoration of Kmt2a ameliorates neurological phenotypes [72]. Pharmacological inhibition of LSD1 improves behavioral, morphological, or transcriptional abnormalities in Setd1a-, Kmt2c-, and Kmt2d-deficient mice [39,75,77], while histone deacetylase inhibition also ameliorates chromatin and neurogenic abnormalities in Kmt2d mutant mice [76]. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of LSD1 inhibition may differ among these models. LSD1 primarily demethylates H3K4me1 and H3K4me2 but cannot directly remove H3K4me3 [141,142]. Therefore, although SETD1A predominantly catalyzes H3K4 trimethylation [30,31,32], the beneficial effects of LSD1 inhibition in Setd1a-deficient mice are unlikely to result from direct restoration of H3K4me3 through inhibition of its demethylation. Instead, these effects may involve modulation of H3K4me1/2 at shared regulatory elements, including enhancers, and subsequent normalization of dysregulated transcriptional programs. In contrast, KMT2C and KMT2D primarily regulate enhancer-associated H3K4 monomethylation [32,33,34], suggesting that LSD1 inhibition may more directly counteract their deficiency by preserving H3K4me1 at affected regulatory regions. Nevertheless, the precise molecular mechanisms responsible for the observed phenotypic improvements remain to be fully elucidated. Furthermore, LSD1 also regulates non-histone substrates [143], and its neuron-specific isoform, LSD1n, exhibits distinct substrate specificities and contributes to neuronal differentiation and activity-dependent gene expression [144,145,146]. These properties indicate that pharmacological LSD1 inhibition may affect multiple chromatin-associated and non-histone regulatory pathways, potentially influencing neuronal functions independently of H3K4 methylation.

Importantly, therapeutic opportunities may not be restricted to correction of transcriptional abnormalities. As described above, SETD5 insufficiency reduces rDNA transcription, ribosome biogenesis, and global protein synthesis, indicating that specific abnormalities in translational capacity may represent downstream targets independently of, or in addition to, transcriptional dysregulation. Likewise, restoration of ERK signaling rescues impaired astrocyte production following Nsd2 loss, and activation of EphA7 signaling ameliorates abnormal synaptic pruning associated with Ash1l deficiency. These findings suggest that targeting well-defined downstream molecular or cellular abnormalities may sometimes be more feasible than directly correcting the primary chromatin-regulatory defect. More broadly, the identification of abnormalities in translation, cytoskeletal regulation, synaptic remodeling, glial differentiation, or cellular signaling emphasizes that SETD-related NDDs should not be considered exclusively as disorders of transcription. Determining which downstream alterations are causal, reversible, and sufficiently selective for therapeutic intervention will therefore be an important goal of future studies.

Future studies should also increasingly incorporate human experimental systems. Patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells, differentiated neural cells, and brain organoids provide opportunities to investigate human-specific aspects of SETD dysfunction that cannot be adequately reproduced in mice. This is particularly important for genes such as EZH1, for which human neural models reveal substantial effects of pathogenic variants on neuronal differentiation despite relatively subtle phenotypes following Ezh1 loss in mice. Genome editing can further enable direct comparison of patient-derived variants in otherwise isogenic genetic backgrounds and allow loss-of-function, gain-of-function, dominant-negative, and substrate-specific mechanisms to be distinguished experimentally. Integration of these approaches with animal models will provide a broader insight into how disruption of epigenetic regulation propagates through transcriptional, translational, and cellular networks to produce abnormal neurodevelopment as well as a powerful framework for distinguishing evolutionarily conserved mechanisms from human-specific consequences of SETD gene dysfunction.

References

1.Thapar A. Cooper M. Rutter M. Neurodevelopmental disorders Lancet Psychiatry 2017 4 339 346 10.1016/s2215-0366(16)30376-5 27979720

2.Morris-Rosendahl D.J. Crocq M.A. Neurodevelopmental disorders-the history and future of a diagnostic concept Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 2020 22 65 72 10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.1/macrocq 32699506 PMC7365295

3.de la Torre-Ubieta L. Won H. Stein J.L. Geschwind D.H. Advancing the understanding of autism disease mechanisms through genetics Nat. Med. 2016 22 345 361 10.1038/nm.4071 27050589 PMC5072455

4.Satterstrom F.K. Kosmicki J.A. Wang J. Breen M.S. De Rubeis S. An J.Y. Peng M. Collins R. Grove J. Klei L. Large-Scale Exome Sequencing Study Implicates Both Developmental and Functional Changes in the Neurobiology of Autism Cell 2020 180 568 584.e523 10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.036 31981491 PMC7250485

5.Parenti I. Rabaneda L.G. Schoen H. Novarino G. Neurodevelopmental Disorders: From Genetics to Functional Pathways Trends Neurosci. 2020 43 608 621 10.1016/j.tins.2020.05.004 32507511

6.Trost B. Thiruvahindrapuram B. Chan A.J.S. Engchuan W. Higginbotham E.J. Howe J.L. Loureiro L.O. Reuter M.S. Roshandel D. Whitney J. Genomic architecture of autism from comprehensive whole-genome sequence annotation Cell 2022 185 4409 4427.e4418 10.1016/j.cell.2022.10.009 36368308 PMC10726699

7.Fernandez Garcia M. Retallick-Townsley K. Pruitt A. Davidson E.A. Balafkan N. Warrell J. Huang T.C. Kibowen A. Chu Z. Dai Y. Transcriptomic and phenotypic convergence of neurodevelopmental disorder risk genes in vitro and in vivo Nat. Neurosci. 2026 29 1079 1094 10.1038/s41593-026-02247-7 42032432 PMC13156037

8.Tschiersch B. Hofmann A. Krauss V. Dorn R. Korge G. Reuter G. The protein encoded by the Drosophila position-effect variegation suppressor gene Su(var)3-9 combines domains of antagonistic regulators of homeotic gene complexes EMBO J. 1994 13 3822 3831 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06693.x 7915232 PMC395295

9.Dambacher S. Hahn M. Schotta G. Epigenetic regulation of development by histone lysine methylation Heredity 2010 105 24 37 10.1038/hdy.2010.49 20442736

10.Husmann D. Gozani O. Histone lysine methyltransferases in biology and disease Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2019 26 880 889 10.1038/s41594-019-0298-7 31582846 PMC6951022

11.Long H.K. Prescott S.L. Wysocka J. Ever-Changing Landscapes: Transcriptional Enhancers in Development and Evolution Cell 2016 167 1170 1187 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.018 27863239 PMC5123704

12.McCauley B.S. Dang W. Loosening chromatin and dysregulated transcription: A perspective on cryptic transcription during mammalian aging Brief. Funct. Genom. 2022 21 56 61 10.1093/bfgp/elab026 34050364 PMC8789305

13.Yuan W. Xu M. Huang C. Liu N. Chen S. Zhu B. H3K36 methylation antagonizes PRC2-mediated H3K27 methylation J. Biol. Chem. 2011 286 7983 7989 10.1074/jbc.M110.194027 21239496 PMC3048685

14.Schmitges F.W. Prusty A.B. Faty M. Stützer A. Lingaraju G.M. Aiwazian J. Sack R. Hess D. Li L. Zhou S. Histone methylation by PRC2 is inhibited by active chromatin marks Mol. Cell 2011 42 330 341 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.03.025 21549310

15.Trievel R.C. Beach B.M. Dirk L.M. Houtz R.L. Hurley J.H. Structure and catalytic mechanism of a SET domain protein methyltransferase Cell 2002 111 91 103 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)01000-0 12372303

16.Qian C. Zhou M.M. SET domain protein lysine methyltransferases: Structure, specificity and catalysis Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2006 63 2755 2763 10.1007/s00018-006-6274-5 17013555 PMC11136235

17.Madan V. Madan B. Brykczynska U. Zilbermann F. Hogeveen K. Döhner K. Döhner H. Weber O. Blum C. Rodewald H.R. Impaired function of primitive hematopoietic cells in mice lacking the Mixed-Lineage-Leukemia homolog MLL5 Blood 2009 113 1444 1454 10.1182/blood-2008-02-142638 18952892

18.Mas Y.M.S. Barbon M. Teyssier C. Déméné H. Carvalho J.E. Bird L.E. Lebedev A. Fattori J. Schubert M. Dumas C. The Human Mixed Lineage Leukemia 5 (MLL5), a Sequentially and Structurally Divergent SET Domain-Containing Protein with No Intrinsic Catalytic Activity PLoS ONE 2016 11 e016513910.1371/journal.pone.0165139 27812132 PMC5094779

19.Zhang Y. Shan C.M. Wang J. Bao K. Tong L. Jia S. Molecular basis for the role of oncogenic histone mutations in modulating H3K36 methylation Sci. Rep. 2017 7 43906 10.1038/srep43906 28256625 PMC5335568

20.Damianidou E. Mouratidou L. Kyrousi C. Research models of neurodevelopmental disorders: The right model in the right place Front. Neurosci. 2022 16 103107510.3389/fnins.2022.1031075 36340790 PMC9630472

21.Echefu B. Becker M. Stein D. Ornoy A. Methods for Assessing Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Mice: A Critical Review of Behavioral Tests and Methodological Considerations Searching to Improve Reliability NeuroSci 2025 6 2710.3390/neurosci6020027 40265357 PMC12015833

22.Allis C.D. Berger S.L. Cote J. Dent S. Jenuwien T. Kouzarides T. Pillus L. Reinberg D. Shi Y. Shiekhattar R. New nomenclature for chromatin-modifying enzymes Cell 2007 131 633 636 10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.039 18022353

23.Shilatifard A. The COMPASS family of histone H3K4 methylases: Mechanisms of regulation in development and disease pathogenesis Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2012 81 65 95 10.1146/annurev-biochem-051710-134100 22663077 PMC4010150

24.Van H.T. Xie G. Dong P. Liu Z. Ge K. KMT2 Family of H3K4 Methyltransferases: Enzymatic Activity-dependent and -independent Functions J. Mol. Biol. 2024 436 168453 10.1016/j.jmb.2024.168453 38266981 PMC10957308

25.Miller T. Krogan N.J. Dover J. Erdjument-Bromage H. Tempst P. Johnston M. Greenblatt J.F. Shilatifard A. COMPASS: A complex of proteins associated with a trithorax-related SET domain protein Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001 98 12902 12907 10.1073/pnas.231473398 11687631 PMC60797

26.Roguev A. Schaft D. Shevchenko A. Pijnappel W.W. Wilm M. Aasland R. Stewart A.F. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Set1 complex includes an Ash2 homologue and methylates histone 3 lysine 4 EMBO J. 2001 20 7137 7148 10.1093/emboj/20.24.7137 11742990 PMC125774

27.Mohan M. Herz H.M. Smith E.R. Zhang Y. Jackson J. Washburn M.P. Florens L. Eissenberg J.C. Shilatifard A. The COMPASS family of H3K4 methylases in Drosophila Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011 31 4310 4318 10.1128/mcb.06092-11 21875999 PMC3209330

28.Ardehali M.B. Mei A. Zobeck K.L. Caron M. Lis J.T. Kusch T. Drosophila Set1 is the major histone H3 lysine 4 trimethyltransferase with role in transcription EMBO J. 2011 30 2817 2828 10.1038/emboj.2011.194 21694722 PMC3160253

29.Herz H.M. Mohan M. Garruss A.S. Liang K. Takahashi Y.H. Mickey K. Voets O. Verrijzer C.P. Shilatifard A. Enhancer-associated H3K4 monomethylation by Trithorax-related, the Drosophila homolog of mammalian Mll3/Mll4 Genes Dev. 2012 26 2604 2620 10.1101/gad.201327.112 23166019 PMC3521626

30.Clouaire T. Webb S. Skene P. Illingworth R. Kerr A. Andrews R. Lee J.H. Skalnik D. Bird A. Cfp1 integrates both CpG content and gene activity for accurate H3K4me3 deposition in embryonic stem cells Genes Dev. 2012 26 1714 1728 10.1101/gad.194209.112 22855832 PMC3418589

31.Sze C.C. Ozark P.A. Cao K. Ugarenko M. Das S. Wang L. Marshall S.A. Rendleman E.J. Ryan C.A. Zha D. Coordinated regulation of cellular identity-associated H3K4me3 breadth by the COMPASS family Sci. Adv. 2020 6 eaaz4764 10.1126/sciadv.aaz4764 32637595 PMC7314515

32.Wang H. Helin K. Roles of H3K4 methylation in biology and disease Trends Cell Biol. 2025 35 115 128 10.1016/j.tcb.2024.06.001 38909006

33.Hu D. Gao X. Morgan M.A. Herz H.M. Smith E.R. Shilatifard A. The MLL3/MLL4 branches of the COMPASS family function as major histone H3K4 monomethylases at enhancers Mol. Cell. Biol. 2013 33 4745 4754 10.1128/mcb.01181-13 24081332 PMC3838007

34.Lee J.E. Wang C. Xu S. Cho Y.W. Wang L. Feng X. Baldridge A. Sartorelli V. Zhuang L. Peng W. H3K4 mono- and di-methyltransferase MLL4 is required for enhancer activation during cell differentiation eLife 2013 2 e01503 10.7554/eLife.01503 24368734 PMC3869375

35.Rickels R. Hu D. Collings C.K. Woodfin A.R. Piunti A. Mohan M. Herz H.M. Kvon E. Shilatifard A. An Evolutionary Conserved Epigenetic Mark of Polycomb Response Elements Implemented by Trx/MLL/COMPASS Mol. Cell 2016 63 318 328 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.018 27447986 PMC4996622

36.Hu D. Gao X. Cao K. Morgan M.A. Mas G. Smith E.R. Volk A.G. Bartom E.T. Crispino J.D. Di Croce L. Not All H3K4 Methylations Are Created Equal: Mll2/COMPASS Dependency in Primordial Germ Cell Specification Mol. Cell 2017 65 460 475.e466 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.01.013 28157506 PMC5404503

37.Shinsky S.A. Monteith K.E. Viggiano S. Cosgrove M.S. Biochemical reconstitution and phylogenetic comparison of human SET1 family core complexes involved in histone methylation J. Biol. Chem. 2015 290 6361 6375 10.1074/jbc.M114.627646 25561738 PMC4358272

38.Kummeling J. Stremmelaar D.E. Raun N. Reijnders M.R.F. Willemsen M.H. Ruiterkamp-Versteeg M. Schepens M. Man C.C.O. Gilissen C. Cho M.T. Characterization of SETD1A haploinsufficiency in humans and Drosophila defines a novel neurodevelopmental syndrome Mol. Psychiatry 2021 26 2013 2024 10.1038/s41380-020-0725-5 32346159

39.Mukai J. Cannavò E. Crabtree G.W. Sun Z. Diamantopoulou A. Thakur P. Chang C.Y. Cai Y. Lomvardas S. Takata A. Recapitulation and Reversal of Schizophrenia-Related Phenotypes in Setd1a-Deficient Mice Neuron 2019 104 471 487.e412 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.09.014 31606247 PMC7010348

40.Nagahama K. Sakoori K. Watanabe T. Kishi Y. Kawaji K. Koebis M. Nakao K. Gotoh Y. Aiba A. Uesaka N. Setd1a Insufficiency in Mice Attenuates Excitatory Synaptic Function and Recapitulates Schizophrenia-Related Behavioral Abnormalities Cell Rep. 2020 32 108126 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108126 32937141

41.Weerts M.J.A. Lanko K. Guzmán-Vega F.J. Jackson A. Ramakrishnan R. Cardona-Londoño K.J. Peña-Guerra K.A. van Bever Y. van Paassen B.W. Kievit A. Delineating the molecular and phenotypic spectrum of the SETD1B-related syndrome Genet. Med. 2021 23 2122 2137 10.1038/s41436-021-01246-2 34345025 PMC8553606

42.Steiner C.E. Marques A.P. Growth deficiency, mental retardation and unusual facies Clin. Dysmorphol. 2000 9 155 156 10.1097/00019605-200009020-00021 10826636

43.Sheppard S.E. Campbell I.M. Harr M.H. Gold N. Li D. Bjornsson H.T. Cohen J.S. Fahrner J.A. Fatemi A. Harris J.R. Expanding the genotypic and phenotypic spectrum in a diverse cohort of 104 individuals with Wiedemann-Steiner syndrome Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2021 185 1649 1665 10.1002/ajmg.a.62124 33783954 PMC8631250

44.Cif L. Demailly D. Lin J.P. Barwick K.E. Sa M. Abela L. Malhotra S. Chong W.K. Steel D. Sanchis-Juan A. KMT2B-related disorders: Expansion of the phenotypic spectrum and long-term efficacy of deep brain stimulation Brain 2020 143 3242 3261 10.1093/brain/awaa304 33150406 PMC7719027

45.Rots D. Choufani S. Faundes V. Dingemans A.J.M. Joss S. Foulds N. Jones E.A. Stewart S. Vasudevan P. Dabir T. Pathogenic variants in KMT2C result in a neurodevelopmental disorder distinct from Kleefstra and Kabuki syndromes Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2024 111 1626 1642 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.06.009 39013459 PMC11339626

46.Niikawa N. Matsuura N. Fukushima Y. Ohsawa T. Kajii T. Kabuki make-up syndrome: A syndrome of mental retardation, unusual facies, large and protruding ears, and postnatal growth deficiency J. Pediatr. 1981 99 565 569 10.1016/s0022-3476(81)80255-7 7277096

47.Kuroki Y. Suzuki Y. Chyo H. Hata A. Matsui I. A new malformation syndrome of long palpebral fissures, large ears, depressed nasal tip, and skeletal anomalies associated with postnatal dwarfism and mental retardation J. Pediatr. 1981 99 570 573 10.1016/s0022-3476(81)80256-9 7277097

48.Barry K.K. Tsaparlis M. Hoffman D. Hartman D. Adam M.P. Hung C. Bodamer O.A. From Genotype to Phenotype-A Review of Kabuki Syndrome Genes 2022 13 176110.3390/genes13101761 36292647 PMC9601850

49.O’Donnell-Luria A.H. Pais L.S. Faundes V. Wood J.C. Sveden A. Luria V. Abou Jamra R. Accogli A. Amburgey K. Anderlid B.M. Heterozygous Variants in KMT2E Cause a Spectrum of Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Epilepsy Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2019 104 1210 1222 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.03.021 31079897 PMC6556837

50.Velmans C. O’Donnell-Luria A.H. Argilli E. Tran Mau-Them F. Vitobello A. Chan M.C. Fung J.L. Rech M. Abicht A. Aubert Mucca M. O’Donnell-Luria-Rodan syndrome: Description of a second multinational cohort and refinement of the phenotypic spectrum J. Med. Genet. 2022 59 697 705 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107470 34321323 PMC10256139

51.Fernandes I.R. Cruz A.C.P. Ferrasa A. Phan D. Herai R.H. Muotri A.R. Genetic variations on SETD5 underlying autistic conditions Dev. Neurobiol. 2018 78 500 518 10.1002/dneu.22584 29484850

52.Nakagawa T. Hattori S. Hosoi T. Nakayama K. Neurobehavioral characteristics of mice with SETD5 mutations as models of IDD23 and KBG syndromes Front. Genet. 2022 13 102233910.3389/fgene.2022.1022339 36685966 PMC9846138

53.Luscan A. Laurendeau I. Malan V. Francannet C. Odent S. Giuliano F. Lacombe D. Touraine R. Vidaud M. Pasmant E. Mutations in SETD2 cause a novel overgrowth condition J. Med. Genet. 2014 51 512 517 10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102402 24852293

54.Lumish H.S. Wynn J. Devinsky O. Chung W.K. Brief Report: SETD2 Mutation in a Child with Autism, Intellectual Disabilities and Epilepsy J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2015 45 3764 3770 10.1007/s10803-015-2484-8 26084711

55.Rabin R. Radmanesh A. Glass I.A. Dobyns W.B. Aldinger K.A. Shieh J.T. Romoser S. Bombei H. Dowsett L. Trapane P. Genotype-phenotype correlation at codon 1740 of SETD2 Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2020 182 2037 2048 10.1002/ajmg.a.61724 32710489

56.Douglas J. Hanks S. Temple I.K. Davies S. Murray A. Upadhyaya M. Tomkins S. Hughes H.E. Cole T.R. Rahman N. NSD1 mutations are the major cause of Sotos syndrome and occur in some cases of Weaver syndrome but are rare in other overgrowth phenotypes Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2003 72 132 143 10.1086/345647 12464997 PMC378618

57.Zanoni P. Steindl K. Sengupta D. Joset P. Bahr A. Sticht H. Lang-Muritano M. van Ravenswaaij-Arts C.M.A. Shinawi M. Andrews M. Loss-of-function and missense variants in NSD2 cause decreased methylation activity and are associated with a distinct developmental phenotype Genet. Med. 2021 23 1474 1483 10.1038/s41436-021-01158-1 33941880 PMC8354849

58.Nishi E. Yanagi K. Kaname T. Okamoto N. Clinical details of individuals with Rauch-Steindl syndrome due to NSD2 truncating variants Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 2024 12 e2396 10.1002/mgg3.2396 38353053 PMC10865147

59.Cordova I. Blesson A. Savatt J.M. Sveden A. Mahida S. Hazlett H. Rooney Riggs E. Chopra M. Expansion of the Genotypic and Phenotypic Spectrum of ASH1L-Related Syndromic Neurodevelopmental Disorder Genes 2024 15 42310.3390/genes15040423 38674358 PMC11049257

60.Kleefstra T. Brunner H.G. Amiel J. Oudakker A.R. Nillesen W.M. Magee A. Geneviève D. Cormier-Daire V. van Esch H. Fryns J.P. Loss-of-function mutations in euchromatin histone methyl transferase 1 (EHMT1) cause the 9q34 subtelomeric deletion syndrome Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2006 79 370 377 10.1086/505693 16826528 PMC1559478

61.Willemsen M.H. Vulto-van Silfhout A.T. Nillesen W.M. Wissink-Lindhout W.M. van Bokhoven H. Philip N. Berry-Kravis E.M. Kini U. van Ravenswaaij-Arts C.M. Delle Chiaie B. Update on Kleefstra Syndrome Mol. Syndromol. 2012 2 202 212 10.1159/000335648 22670141 PMC3366700

62.Hnízda A. Martinez-Delgado B. Sanchez-Ponce D. Alonso J. Amiel J. Attie-Bitach T. Bada-Navarro A. Baladron B. Bermejo-Sanchez E. Brinsa V. De novo EHMT2 variants cause an autosomal dominant EHMT2-related Kleefstra syndrome via loss of G9a methyltransferase activity Nat. Commun. 2026 17 8203 10.1038/s41467-026-74987-w 42386776 PMC13462943

63.Gracia-Diaz C. Zhou Y. Yang Q. Maroofian R. Espana-Bonilla P. Lee C.H. Zhang S. Padilla N. Fueyo R. Waxman E.A. Gain and loss of function variants in EZH1 disrupt neurogenesis and cause dominant and recessive neurodevelopmental disorders Nat. Commun. 2023 14 4109 10.1038/s41467-023-39645-5 37433783 PMC10336078

64.Weaver D.D. Graham C.B. Thomas I.T. Smith D.W. A new overgrowth syndrome with accelerated skeletal maturation, unusual facies, and camptodactyly J. Pediatr. 1974 84 547 552 10.1016/s0022-3476(74)80675-x 4366187

65.Tatton-Brown K. Murray A. Hanks S. Douglas J. Armstrong R. Banka S. Bird L.M. Clericuzio C.L. Cormier-Daire V. Cushing T. Weaver syndrome and EZH2 mutations: Clarifying the clinical phenotype Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2013 161 2972 2980 10.1002/ajmg.a.36229 24214728

66.Stessman H.A. Xiong B. Coe B.P. Wang T. Hoekzema K. Fenckova M. Kvarnung M. Gerdts J. Trinh S. Cosemans N. Targeted sequencing identifies 91 neurodevelopmental-disorder risk genes with autism and developmental-disability biases Nat. Genet. 2017 49 515 526 10.1038/ng.3792 28191889 PMC5374041

67.Eliyahu A. Barel O. Greenbaum L. Zaks Hoffer G. Goldberg Y. Raas-Rothschild A. Singer A. Bar-Joseph I. Kunik V. Javasky E. Refining the Phenotypic Spectrum of KMT5B-Associated Developmental Delay Front. Pediatr. 2022 10 84484510.3389/fped.2022.844845 35433545 PMC9005902

68.Sheppard S.E. Bryant L. Wickramasekara R.N. Vaccaro C. Robertson B. Hallgren J. Hulen J. Watson C.J. Faundes V. Duffourd Y. Mechanism of KMT5B haploinsufficiency in neurodevelopment in humans and mice Sci. Adv. 2023 9 eade1463 10.1126/sciadv.ade1463 36897941 PMC10005179

69.Michurina A. Sakib M.S. Kerimoglu C. Krüger D.M. Kaurani L. Islam M.R. Joshi P.D. Schröder S. Centeno T.P. Zhou J. Postnatal expression of the lysine methyltransferase SETD1B is essential for learning and the regulation of neuron-enriched genes EMBO J. 2022 41 e106459 10.15252/embj.2020106459 34806773 PMC8724770

70.Kerimoglu C. Agis-Balboa R.C. Kranz A. Stilling R. Bahari-Javan S. Benito-Garagorri E. Halder R. Burkhardt S. Stewart A.F. Fischer A. Histone-methyltransferase MLL2 (KMT2B) is required for memory formation in mice J. Neurosci. 2013 33 3452 3464 10.1523/jneurosci.3356-12.2013 23426673 PMC6619533

71.Kerimoglu C. Sakib M.S. Jain G. Benito E. Burkhardt S. Capece V. Kaurani L. Halder R. Agís-Balboa R.C. Stilling R. KMT2A and KMT2B Mediate Memory Function by Affecting Distinct Genomic Regions Cell Rep. 2017 20 538 548 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.072 28723559

72.Reynisdottir T. Anderson K.J. Möller K. Pétursson S. Brinn A. Franklin K.P. Ouyang J. Snorradottir A.O. Lutz C.M. Zuberi A.R. In utero rescue of neurological dysfunction in a mouse model of Wiedemann-Steiner syndrome JCI Insight 2025 10 e187039 10.1172/jci.insight.187039 40956618 PMC12581663

73.Koemans T.S. Kleefstra T. Chubak M.C. Stone M.H. Reijnders M.R.F. de Munnik S. Willemsen M.H. Fenckova M. Stumpel C. Bok L.A. Functional convergence of histone methyltransferases EHMT1 and KMT2C involved in intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder PLoS Genet. 2017 13 e100686410.1371/journal.pgen.1006864 29069077 PMC5656305

74.Cuvertino S. Hartill V. Colyer A. Garner T. Nair N. Al-Gazali L. Canham N. Faundes V. Flinter F. Hertecant J. A restricted spectrum of missense KMT2D variants cause a multiple malformations disorder distinct from Kabuki syndrome Genet. Med. 2020 22 867 877 10.1038/s41436-019-0743-3 31949313 PMC7200597

75.Nakamura T. Yoshihara T. Tanegashima C. Kadota M. Kobayashi Y. Honda K. Ishiwata M. Ueda J. Hara T. Nakanishi M. Transcriptomic dysregulation and autistic-like behaviors in Kmt2c haploinsufficient mice rescued by an LSD1 inhibitor Mol. Psychiatry 2024 29 2888 2904 10.1038/s41380-024-02479-8 38528071 PMC11420081

76.Bjornsson H.T. Benjamin J.S. Zhang L. Weissman J. Gerber E.E. Chen Y.C. Vaurio R.G. Potter M.C. Hansen K.D. Dietz H.C. Histone deacetylase inhibition rescues structural and functional brain deficits in a mouse model of Kabuki syndrome Sci. Transl. Med. 2014 6 256ra135 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009278 25273096 PMC4406328

77.Zhang L. Pilarowski G. Pich E.M. Nakatani A. Dunlop J. Baba R. Matsuda S. Daini M. Hattori Y. Matsumoto S. Inhibition of KDM1A activity restores adult neurogenesis and improves hippocampal memory in a mouse model of Kabuki syndrome Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 2021 20 779 791 10.1016/j.omtm.2021.02.011 33738331 PMC7940709

78.Li Y.J. Li C.Y. Hu D.X. Xv Z.B. Zhang S.H. Li Q. Zhang P. Tian B. Lan X.L. Chen X.Q. KMT2E Haploinsufficiency Manifests Autism-Like Behaviors and Amygdala Neuronal Development Dysfunction in Mice Mol. Neurobiol. 2023 60 1609 1625 10.1007/s12035-022-03167-w 36534336

79.Gao S. Lin Q. Liu X. Jia M. Zhang A.Y. Feng Z. Han L. Qiu N. Liu X.X. Zhai H. Mll5 haploinsufficiency attenuates microglial phagocytosis through dysregulated TREM2-SGK3-GSK3β signaling and recapitulates ASD-like behaviors in mice Nat. Commun. 2026 17 5375 10.1038/s41467-026-71922-x 41997967 PMC13276046

80.Li M. Hou Y. Zhang Z. Zhang B. Huang T. Sun A. Shao G. Lin Q. Structure, activity and function of the lysine methyltransferase SETD5 Front. Endocrinol. 2023 14 108952710.3389/fendo.2023.1089527 36875494 PMC9982096

81.Sessa A. Fagnocchi L. Mastrototaro G. Massimino L. Zaghi M. Indrigo M. Cattaneo S. Martini D. Gabellini C. Pucci C. SETD5 Regulates Chromatin Methylation State and Preserves Global Transcriptional Fidelity during Brain Development and Neuronal Wiring Neuron 2019 104 271 289.e213 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.07.013 31515109

82.Deliu E. Arecco N. Morandell J. Dotter C.P. Contreras X. Girardot C. Käsper E.L. Kozlova A. Kishi K. Chiaradia I. Haploinsufficiency of the intellectual disability gene SETD5 disturbs developmental gene expression and cognition Nat. Neurosci. 2018 21 1717 1727 10.1038/s41593-018-0266-2 30455454

83.Wang Z. Hausmann S. Lyu R. Li T.M. Lofgren S.M. Flores N.M. Fuentes M.E. Caporicci M. Yang Z. Meiners M.J. SETD5-Coordinated Chromatin Reprogramming Regulates Adaptive Resistance to Targeted Pancreatic Cancer Therapy Cancer Cell 2020 37 834 849.e813 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.04.014 32442403 PMC8187079

84.Grozeva D. Carss K. Spasic-Boskovic O. Parker M.J. Archer H. Firth H.V. Park S.M. Canham N. Holder S.E. Wilson M. De novo loss-of-function mutations in SETD5, encoding a methyltransferase in a 3p25 microdeletion syndrome critical region, cause intellectual disability Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2014 94 618 624 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.03.006 24680889 PMC3980521

85.Powis Z. Farwell Hagman K.D. Mroske C. McWalter K. Cohen J.S. Colombo R. Serretti A. Fatemi A. David K.L. Reynolds J. Expansion and further delineation of the SETD5 phenotype leading to global developmental delay, variable dysmorphic features, and reduced penetrance Clin. Genet. 2018 93 752 761 10.1111/cge.13132 28881385

86.Moore S.M. Seidman J.S. Ellegood J. Gao R. Savchenko A. Troutman T.D. Abe Y. Stender J. Lee D. Wang S. Setd5 haploinsufficiency alters neuronal network connectivity and leads to autistic-like behaviors in mice Transl. Psychiatry 2019 9 24 10.1038/s41398-018-0344-y 30655503 PMC6336863

87.Nakagawa T. Hattori S. Nobuta R. Kimura R. Nakagawa M. Matsumoto M. Nagasawa Y. Funayama R. Miyakawa T. Inada T. The Autism-Related Protein SETD5 Controls Neural Cell Proliferation through Epigenetic Regulation of rDNA Expression iScience 2020 23 101030 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101030 32299058 PMC7160574

88.Li W. Tian W. Yuan G. Deng P. Sengupta D. Cheng Z. Cao Y. Ren J. Qin Y. Zhou Y. Molecular basis of nucleosomal H3K36 methylation by NSD methyltransferases Nature 2021 590 498 503 10.1038/s41586-020-03069-8 33361816 PMC7889650

89.Lee Y. Yoon E. Cho S. Schmähling S. Müller J. Song J.J. Structural Basis of MRG15-Mediated Activation of the ASH1L Histone Methyltransferase by Releasing an Autoinhibitory Loop Structure 2019 27 846 852.e843 10.1016/j.str.2019.01.016 30827841

90.Markert J.W. Soffers J.H. Farnung L. Structural basis of H3K36 trimethylation by SETD2 during chromatin transcription Science 2025 387 528 533 10.1126/science.adn6319 39666822 PMC12366524

91.Park I.Y. Powell R.T. Tripathi D.N. Dere R. Ho T.H. Blasius T.L. Chiang Y.C. Davis I.J. Fahey C.C. Hacker K.E. Dual Chromatin and Cytoskeletal Remodeling by SETD2 Cell 2016 166 950 962 10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.005 27518565 PMC5101839

92.Kearns S. Mason F.M. Rathmell W.K. Park I.Y. Walker C. Verhey K.J. Cianfrocco M.A. Molecular determinants for α-tubulin methylation by SETD2 J. Biol. Chem. 2021 297 100898 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100898 34157286 PMC8294582

93.Parra A. Rabin R. Pappas J. Pascual P. Cazalla M. Arias P. Gallego-Zazo N. Santana A. Arroyo I. Artigas M. Clinical Heterogeneity and Different Phenotypes in Patients with SETD2 Variants: 18 New Patients and Review of the Literature Genes 2023 14 117910.3390/genes14061179 37372360 PMC10297832

94.Xu L. Zheng Y. Li X. Wang A. Huo D. Li Q. Wang S. Luo Z. Liu Y. Xu F. Abnormal neocortex arealization and Sotos-like syndrome-associated behavior in Setd2 mutant mice Sci. Adv. 2021 7 eaba1180 10.1126/sciadv.aba1180 33523829 PMC7775761

95.Koenning M. Wang X. Karki M. Jangid R.K. Kearns S. Tripathi D.N. Cianfrocco M. Verhey K.J. Jung S.Y. Coarfa C. Neuronal SETD2 activity links microtubule methylation to an anxiety-like phenotype in mice Brain 2021 144 2527 2540 10.1093/brain/awab200 34014281 PMC8418347

96.Oishi S. Zalucki O. Vega M.S. Harkins D. Harvey T.J. Kasherman M. Davila R.A. Hale L. White M. Piltz S. Investigating cortical features of Sotos syndrome using mice heterozygous for Nsd1 Genes Brain Behav. 2020 19 e12637 10.1111/gbb.12637 31909872

97.Zheng Y. Zhao C. Song Q. Xu L. Zhang B. Hu G. Kong X. Li S. Li X. Shen Y. Histone methylation mediated by NSD1 is required for the establishment and maintenance of neuronal identities Cell Rep. 2023 42 113496 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113496 37995181

98.Zollino M. Lecce R. Fischetto R. Murdolo M. Faravelli F. Selicorni A. Buttè C. Memo L. Capovilla G. Neri G. Mapping the Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome phenotype outside the currently accepted WHS critical region and defining a new critical region, WHSCR-2 Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2003 72 590 597 10.1086/367925 12563561 PMC1180235

99.Barrie E.S. Alfaro M.P. Pfau R.B. Goff M.J. McBride K.L. Manickam K. Zmuda E.J. De novo loss-of-function variants in NSD2 (WHSC1) associate with a subset of Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome Cold Spring Harb. Mol. Case Stud. 2019 5 a004044 10.1101/mcs.a004044 31171569 PMC6672030

100.Wiel L.C. Bruno I. Barbi E. Sirchia F. From Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome to NSD2 haploinsufficiency: A shifting paradigm through the description of a new case and a review of the literature Ital. J. Pediatr. 2022 48 72 10.1186/s13052-022-01267-w 35550183 PMC9097050

101.Yang Q. Gong D. Yi S. Luo J. Zhang Q. Case report: A de novo NSD2 truncating variant in a child with Rauch-Steindl syndrome Front. Pediatr. 2023 11 106478310.3389/fped.2023.1064783 37351323 PMC10282739

102.Chen H. Li M. Hou L. Yin B. Qiang B. Gao R. Shu P. Peng X. NSD2 Coordinates the Neurogenic-to-Gliogenic Transition via H3K36me2-Dependent Activation of the EGFR-ERK Pathway Adv. Sci. 2026 13 e76695 10.1002/advs.76695 42505068 PMC13403718

103.Yan Y. Tian M. Li M. Zhou G. Chen Q. Xu M. Hu Y. Luo W. Guo X. Zhang C. ASH1L haploinsufficiency results in autistic-like phenotypes in mice and links Eph receptor gene to autism spectrum disorder Neuron 2022 110 1156 1172.e1159 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.12.035 35081333

104.Gao Y. Duque-Wilckens N. Aljazi M.B. Wu Y. Moeser A.J. Mias G.I. Robison A.J. He J. Loss of histone methyltransferase ASH1L in the developing mouse brain causes autistic-like behaviors Commun. Biol. 2021 4 756 10.1038/s42003-021-02282-z 34145365 PMC8213741

105.Wu H. Min J. Lunin V.V. Antoshenko T. Dombrovski L. Zeng H. Allali-Hassani A. Campagna-Slater V. Vedadi M. Arrowsmith C.H. Structural biology of human H3K9 methyltransferases PLoS ONE 2010 5 e857010.1371/journal.pone.0008570 20084102 PMC2797608

106.Padeken J. Methot S.P. Gasser S.M. Establishment of H3K9-methylated heterochromatin and its functions in tissue differentiation and maintenance Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022 23 623 640 10.1038/s41580-022-00483-w 35562425 PMC9099300

107.Levinsky A.J. McEdwards G. Sethna N. Currie M.A. Targets of histone H3 lysine 9 methyltransferases Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022 10 102640610.3389/fcell.2022.1026406 36568972 PMC9768651

108.Collins R.E. Northrop J.P. Horton J.R. Lee D.Y. Zhang X. Stallcup M.R. Cheng X. The ankyrin repeats of G9a and GLP histone methyltransferases are mono- and dimethyllysine binding modules Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008 15 245 250 10.1038/nsmb.1384 18264113 PMC2586904

109.Rots D. de Oliveira B.C. Carvalho L.M.L. Zhao X. Sadikovic B. Sim T. Rigobello R. Tedder M. Donoghue S. Maripuri D.P. A role for EHMT2 in a novel autosomal recessive neurodevelopmental syndrome? A case report Front. Genet. 2026 17 182413810.3389/fgene.2026.1824138 42434347 PMC13350482

110.Balemans M.C. Kasri N.N. Kopanitsa M.V. Afinowi N.O. Ramakers G. Peters T.A. Beynon A.J. Janssen S.M. van Summeren R.C. Eeftens J.M. Hippocampal dysfunction in the Euchromatin histone methyltransferase 1 heterozygous knockout mouse model for Kleefstra syndrome Hum. Mol. Genet. 2013 22 852 866 10.1093/hmg/dds490 23175442

111.Schaefer A. Sampath S.C. Intrator A. Min A. Gertler T.S. Surmeier D.J. Tarakhovsky A. Greengard P. Control of cognition and adaptive behavior by the GLP/G9a epigenetic suppressor complex Neuron 2009 64 678 691 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.11.019 20005824 PMC2814156

112.Cao Y. Li L. Fan Z. The role and mechanisms of polycomb repressive complex 2 on the regulation of osteogenic and neurogenic differentiation of stem cells Cell Prolif. 2021 54 e13032 10.1111/cpr.13032 33759287 PMC8088470

113.An R. Li Y.Q. Lin Y.L. Xu F. Li M.M. Liu Z. EZH1/2 as targets for cancer therapy Cancer Gene Ther. 2023 30 221 235 10.1038/s41417-022-00555-1 36369341

114.Brooun A. Gajiwala K.S. Deng Y.L. Liu W. Bolaños B. Bingham P. He Y.A. Diehl W. Grable N. Kung P.P. Polycomb repressive complex 2 structure with inhibitor reveals a mechanism of activation and drug resistance Nat. Commun. 2016 7 11384 10.1038/ncomms11384 27122193 PMC4853478

115.Lui J.C. Garrison P. Nguyen Q. Ad M. Keembiyehetty C. Chen W. Jee Y.H. Landman E. Nilsson O. Barnes K.M. EZH1 and EZH2 promote skeletal growth by repressing inhibitors of chondrocyte proliferation and hypertrophy Nat. Commun. 2016 7 13685 10.1038/ncomms13685 27897169 PMC5477487

116.Deevy O. Li J. Monger C. Matrà F. Tuck E. Davies M. Badonyi M. Boyce M. Doyle E.J. Hokamp K. Dominant-negative effects of Weaver syndrome-associated EZH2 variants Genes Dev. 2025 39 1355 1376 10.1101/gad.351884.124 40846643 PMC12581829

117.Zhang M. Zhang Y. Xu Q. Crawford J. Qian C. Wang G.H. Qian J. Dong X.Z. Pletnikov M.V. Liu C.M. Neuronal Histone Methyltransferase EZH2 Regulates Neuronal Morphogenesis, Synaptic Plasticity, and Cognitive Behavior in Mice Neurosci. Bull. 2023 39 1512 1532 10.1007/s12264-023-01074-1 37326884 PMC10533778

118.Corvalan A.Z. Coller H.A. Methylation of histone 4’s lysine 20: A critical analysis of the state of the field Physiol. Genom. 2021 53 22 32 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00128.2020 33197229 PMC7847046

119.Huang L. Wang Y. Long H. Zhu H. Wen Z. Zhang L. Zhang W. Guo Z. Wang L. Tang F. Structural insight into H4K20 methylation on H2A.Z-nucleosome by SUV420H1 Mol. Cell 2023 83 2884 2895.e2887 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.07.001 37536340

120.Lin F. Zhang R. Shao W. Lei C. Ma M. Zhang Y. Wen Z. Li W. Structural basis of nucleosomal H4K20 recognition and methylation by SUV420H1 methyltransferase Cell Discov. 2023 9 120 10.1038/s41421-023-00620-5 38052811 PMC10697951

121.Prevalence and architecture of de novo mutations in developmental disorders Nature 2017 542 433 438 10.1038/nature21062 28135719 PMC6016744

122.Provenzano A. La Barbera A. Scagnet M. Pagliazzi A. Traficante G. Pantaleo M. Tiberi L. Vergani D. Kurtas N.E. Guarducci S. Chiari 1 malformation and exome sequencing in 51 trios: The emerging role of rare missense variants in chromatin-remodeling genes Hum. Genet. 2021 140 625 647 10.1007/s00439-020-02231-6 33337535 PMC7981314

123.Gupta V. Ben-Mahmoud A. Ku B. Velayutham D. Jan Z. Yousef Aden A. Kubbar A. Alshaban F. Stanton L.W. Jithesh P.V. Identification of two novel autism genes, TRPC4 and SCFD2, in Qatar simplex families through exome sequencing Front Psychiatry 2023 14 125188410.3389/fpsyt.2023.1251884 38025430 PMC10644705

124.Hulen J. Kenny D. Black R. Hallgren J. Hammond K.G. Bredahl E.C. Wickramasekara R.N. Abel P.W. Stessman H.A.F. KMT5B is required for early motor development Front. Genet. 2022 13 90122810.3389/fgene.2022.901228 36035149 PMC9411648

125.Chen G. Han L. Tan S. Jia X. Wu H. Quan Y. Zhang Q. Yu B. Hu Z. Xia K. Loss-of-function of KMT5B leads to neurodevelopmental disorder and impairs neuronal development and neurogenesis J. Genet. Genom. 2022 49 881 890 10.1016/j.jgg.2022.03.004 35331928

126.Kwiatkowski S. Seliga A.K. Vertommen D. Terreri M. Ishikawa T. Grabowska I. Tiebe M. Teleman A.A. Jagielski A.K. Veiga-da-Cunha M. SETD3 protein is the actin-specific histidine N-methyltransferase eLife 2018 7 e37921 10.7554/eLife.37921 30526847 PMC6289574

127.Wilkinson A.W. Diep J. Dai S. Liu S. Ooi Y.S. Song D. Li T.M. Horton J.R. Zhang X. Liu C. SETD3 is an actin histidine methyltransferase that prevents primary dystocia Nature 2019 565 372 376 10.1038/s41586-018-0821-8 30626964 PMC6511263

128.Guo Q. Liao S. Kwiatkowski S. Tomaka W. Yu H. Wu G. Tu X. Min J. Drozak J. Xu C. Structural insights into SETD3-mediated histidine methylation on β-actin eLife 2019 8 e43676 10.7554/eLife.43676 30785395 PMC6400499

129.Baraitser M. Winter R.M. Iris coloboma, ptosis, hypertelorism, and mental retardation: A new syndrome J. Med. Genet. 1988 25 41 43 10.1136/jmg.25.1.41 3351890 PMC1015421

130.Verloes A. Di Donato N. Masliah-Planchon J. Jongmans M. Abdul-Raman O.A. Albrecht B. Allanson J. Brunner H. Bertola D. Chassaing N. Baraitser-Winter cerebrofrontofacial syndrome: Delineation of the spectrum in 42 cases Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2015 23 292 301 10.1038/ejhg.2014.95 25052316 PMC4326722

131.Marquardt A. Münchhoff M.S. Krohn J. Palarz P.M. Taft M.H. Greve J.N. Di Donato N. Buettner F.F.R. Manstein D.J. Disruption of SETD3-mediated histidine-73 methylation by the BWCFF-associated β-actin G74S mutation FEBS Lett. 2025 599 2449 2462 10.1002/1873-3468.70088 40490999 PMC12421705

132.Weinberg D.N. Papillon-Cavanagh S. Chen H. Yue Y. Chen X. Rajagopalan K.N. Horth C. McGuire J.T. Xu X. Nikbakht H. The histone mark H3K36me2 recruits DNMT3A and shapes the intergenic DNA methylation landscape Nature 2019 573 281 286 10.1038/s41586-019-1534-3 31485078 PMC6742567

133.Chen H. Hu B. Horth C. Bareke E. Rosenbaum P. Kwon S.Y. Sirois J. Weinberg D.N. Robison F.M. Garcia B.A. H3K36 dimethylation shapes the epigenetic interaction landscape by directing repressive chromatin modifications in embryonic stem cells Genome Res. 2022 32 825 837 10.1101/gr.276383.121 35396277 PMC9104706

134.Rondelet G. Dal Maso T. Willems L. Wouters J. Structural basis for recognition of histone H3K36me3 nucleosome by human de novo DNA methyltransferases 3A and 3B J. Struct. Biol. 2016 194 357 367 10.1016/j.jsb.2016.03.013 26993463

135.Cho C.C. Huang H.H. Jiang B.C. Yang W.Z. Chen Y.N. Yuan H.S. Histone modification-driven structural remodeling unleashes DNMT3B in DNA methylation Sci. Adv. 2025 11 eadu8116 10.1126/sciadv.adu8116 40138405 PMC11939060

136.Streubel G. Watson A. Jammula S.G. Scelfo A. Fitzpatrick D.J. Oliviero G. McCole R. Conway E. Glancy E. Negri G.L. The H3K36me2 Methyltransferase Nsd1 Demarcates PRC2-Mediated H3K27me2 and H3K27me3 Domains in Embryonic Stem Cells Mol. Cell 2018 70 371 379.e375 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.02.027 29606589

137.Aref-Eshghi E. Kerkhof J. Pedro V.P. Barat-Houari M. Ruiz-Pallares N. Andrau J.C. Lacombe D. Van-Gils J. Fergelot P. Dubourg C. Evaluation of DNA Methylation Episignatures for Diagnosis and Phenotype Correlations in 42 Mendelian Neurodevelopmental Disorders Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2020 106 356 370 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.01.019 32109418 PMC7058829

138.Choufani S. Cytrynbaum C. Chung B.H. Turinsky A.L. Grafodatskaya D. Chen Y.A. Cohen A.S. Dupuis L. Butcher D.T. Siu M.T. NSD1 mutations generate a genome-wide DNA methylation signature Nat. Commun. 2015 6 10207 10.1038/ncomms10207 26690673 PMC4703864

139.Choufani S. Gibson W.T. Turinsky A.L. Chung B.H.Y. Wang T. Garg K. Vitriolo A. Cohen A.S.A. Cyrus S. Goodman S. DNA Methylation Signature for EZH2 Functionally Classifies Sequence Variants in Three PRC2 Complex Genes Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2020 106 596 610 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.03.008 32243864 PMC7212265

140.Sadikovic B. Levy M.A. Aref-Eshghi E. Functional annotation of genomic variation: DNA methylation episignatures in neurodevelopmental Mendelian disorders Hum. Mol. Genet. 2020 29 R27 R32 10.1093/hmg/ddaa144 32644126

141.Shi Y. Lan F. Matson C. Mulligan P. Whetstine J.R. Cole P.A. Casero R.A. Histone demethylation mediated by the nuclear amine oxidase homolog LSD1 Cell 2004 119 941 953 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.012 15620353

142.Anand R. Marmorstein R. Structure and mechanism of lysine-specific demethylase enzymes J. Biol. Chem. 2007 282 35425 35429 10.1074/jbc.R700027200 17897944

143.Gu F. Lin Y. Wang Z. Wu X. Ye Z. Wang Y. Lan H. Biological roles of LSD1 beyond its demethylase activity Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2020 77 3341 3350 10.1007/s00018-020-03489-9 32193608 PMC11105033

144.Laurent B. Ruitu L. Murn J. Hempel K. Ferrao R. Xiang Y. Liu S. Garcia B.A. Wu H. Wu F. A specific LSD1/KDM1A isoform regulates neuronal differentiation through H3K9 demethylation Mol. Cell 2015 57 957 970 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.01.010 25684206 PMC4369399

145.Wang J. Telese F. Tan Y. Li W. Jin C. He X. Basnet H. Ma Q. Merkurjev D. Zhu X. LSD1n is an H4K20 demethylase regulating memory formation via transcriptional elongation control Nat. Neurosci. 2015 18 1256 1264 10.1038/nn.4069 26214369 PMC4625987

146.Porter R.S. An S. Gavilan M.C. Nagai M. Murata-Nakamura Y. Zhou B. Bonefas K.M. Dionne O. Manuel J.M. St-Germain J. Coordinated neuron-specific splicing events restrict nucleosome engagement of the LSD1 histone demethylase complex Cell Rep. 2025 44 115213 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.115213 39817906 PMC11864812

Come citare questo studio

Aki Ohguri, Tadashi Nakagawa, Makiko Nakagawa, Toru Hosoi. (2026). SET Domain Genes in Neurodevelopmental Disorders.. Genes. DOI: 10.3390/genes17101313

Consulta la pubblicazione originale ↗