Moving the goal post and using ethics as a rhetorical refuge doesn't change the evidence: About the debate on the best care for minors with gender issues.
BMC medical ethics · 2026
Abstract e pubblicazione originale
L’abstract è consultabile nella fonte originale. Non viene ripubblicato qui perché non risulta verificata una licenza compatibile.
Leggi nella fonte originale ↗Parole chiave
HumansGender DysphoriaAdolescentMinorsMaleFemaleBeneficencePersonal AutonomyEthics, MedicalPuberty SuppressionPuberty InhibitorsQuality of LifeGoalsChildren adolescentsCross-sex-hormonesDevelopment.EthicsGender dysphoriaGender incongruenceLife projectPuberty blockageSelf-interpretation
Come citare questo studio
F D Zepf, M Ligges, C Ligges, L König, T Banaschewski, C S Monsalve, R Kaltiala, J Smids. (2026). Moving the goal post and using ethics as a rhetorical refuge doesn't change the evidence: About the debate on the best care for minors with gender issues.. BMC medical ethics. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-026-01631-z
Consulta la pubblicazione originale ↗