6 Novembre 2026

Psicologia Punto One | Psicologia e Psicologi nel Web

SCHEDA SCIENTIFICA2026Studio osservazionale

Factors Associated With Falls Among the Elderly With Type 2 Diabetes in Urban Shanghai: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Zhenping Lu, Hui Gao, Huiyao Zhu, Dong Chen, Yinzhu Zhuang, Lei Zhang, Li Yu, Qinghua Xia, Yu Jiang

Journal of diabetes research · 2026

Abstract originale

AIM: This study is aimed at identifying the factors associated with falls among community-dwelling elderly individuals with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in urban Shanghai, China. METHODS: The study analyzed data from 842 diabetic patients aged 60 years or older. Information about associated factors and main outcome measures was collected using structured questionnaires. Chi-square tests and binary logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with falls. RESULTS: Among the participants, 239 (28.4%) experienced at least one fall and 41 (17.2%) of these fallers had recurrent falls in the past 1 year. Univariate analysis identified a range of potential factors for falls, including physical impairments (e.g., dizziness, fatigue, unsteadiness), psychological factors (e.g., depression, activity restriction due to fear of falling), and adverse lifestyle factors (e.g., inactivity, poor sleep, frequent nocturia) (p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that balance test score (OR = 1.687, 95% CI: 1.162-2.447, p = 0.006), PHQ-9 depression category (OR = 1.663, 95% CI: 1.028-2.691, p = 0.038) and activity restriction due to fear of falling (OR = 2.503, 95% CI: 1.752-3.575, p < 0.001) were independently associated with falls. For recurrent falls, activity restriction due to fear of falling remained significantly associated across models (OR range: 2.045-2.165, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Falls were common among elderly diabetic residents in urban Shanghai, and multiple factors were identified as potential correlates. Our findings support the use of multidomain screening to identify high-risk individuals for falls and to inform targeted assessment approaches, warranting further prospective investigations.

Parole chiave

HumansAccidental FallsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleMaleAgedChinaCross-Sectional StudiesRisk FactorsMiddle AgedAged, 80 and overLogistic ModelsSurveys and QuestionnairesDepressionPostural BalanceUrban PopulationType 2 diabetes mellitusassociated factorselderlyfalls
Leggi il testo integrale originale

Testo estratto dalla pubblicazione: sono esclusi immagini, media, supplementi e parti soggette a diritti distinti.

Factors Associated With Falls Among the Elderly With Type 2 Diabetes in Urban Shanghai: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Aim

This study is aimed at identifying the factors associated with falls among community‐dwelling elderly individuals with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in urban Shanghai, China.

Methods

The study analyzed data from 842 diabetic patients aged 60 years or older. Information about associated factors and main outcome measures was collected using structured questionnaires. Chi‐square tests and binary logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with falls.

Results

Among the participants, 239 (28.4%) experienced at least one fall and 41 (17.2%) of these fallers had recurrent falls in the past 1 year. Univariate analysis identified a range of potential factors for falls, including physical impairments (e.g., dizziness, fatigue, unsteadiness), psychological factors (e.g., depression, activity restriction due to fear of falling), and adverse lifestyle factors (e.g., inactivity, poor sleep, frequent nocturia) (p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that balance test score (OR = 1.687, 95% CI: 1.162–2.447, p = 0.006), PHQ‐9 depression category (OR = 1.663, 95% CI: 1.028–2.691, p = 0.038) and activity restriction due to fear of falling (OR = 2.503, 95% CI: 1.752–3.575, p < 0.001) were independently associated with falls. For recurrent falls, activity restriction due to fear of falling remained significantly associated across models (OR range: 2.045–2.165, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Falls were common among elderly diabetic residents in urban Shanghai, and multiple factors were identified as potential correlates. Our findings support the use of multidomain screening to identify high‐risk individuals for falls and to inform targeted assessment approaches, warranting further prospective investigations.

1. Introduction

Falls represent a pervasive and serious public health challenge among older populations worldwide. Each year, more than one‐quarter of individuals aged 65 or older sustain at least one fall [1], an event that not only undermines their physical autonomy and well‐being but also contributes to elevated rates of illness, mortality, and healthcare expenditure [2, 3]. Meanwhile, China faces the heaviest diabetes burden globally. National surveillance data from 2015 to 2018 indicate that the crude incidence of diabetes among middle‐aged and older Chinese adults reached approximately 3920 per 100,000 person‐years, with a pronounced upward trajectory over this period [4]. A fall was defined as “an unexpected event in which the participant comes to rest on the ground, floor, or lower level” [5]. Accumulating evidence indicates that older adults with T2DM face a higher fall risk than those without [6–8]. Several studies have identified a range of correlates of falls in this population, including age, polypharmacy, insulin therapy, peripheral neuropathy, and impaired balance [9–11]. Nevertheless, the role of certain factors remains inconclusive, and the vast majority of existing evidence originates from Western settings [12–14]. Given the paucity of research on fall‐related issues among older Chinese adults with diabetes, further population‐based investigations are warranted to explore modifiable factors associated with falls in this population. To address this gap, the present study aimed to estimate the prevalence of falls and identify its associated factors among community‐dwelling older adults with T2DM in urban Shanghai, China.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participants

This cross‐sectional study was conducted in Changning District, Shanghai, China, between May and June 2024. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) age ≥ 60 years; (2) currently registered as a Type 2 diabetes patient in the community; (3) ability to communicate normally and walk independently; and (4) voluntary participation in the survey with signed informed consent. The sample size was determined using the formula: μ2α/2π1−π/δ2, where μ
α/2 = 1.96 (two‐sided α = 0.05), π = 0.30 was the estimated fall prevalence based on previous studies, and the relative error was set at 10%, giving an absolute error δ = 0.03. The calculated sample size was 896, which was rounded up to 900 to allow for missing or incomplete data. The sampling frame consisted of community‐managed elderly T2DM patients aged ≥ 60 years registered in the Changning District Chronic Disease Health Management System (total population: 28,300 individuals). Using simple random sampling with a fixed random seed of 123456, 900 diabetic patients were initially selected from this frame. Trained community physicians contacted the selected individuals by telephone to explain the study objectives and invite them to participate. Of these, 52 individuals declined to participate, mainly due to time constraints or lack of interest. Six participants did not complete the survey, due to partial completion of the questionnaire or early withdrawal during the assessment. Ultimately, 842 elderly patients with T2DM were included in the final analysis (response rate: 93.6%). The participant selection process is illustrated in Figure 1.

2.2. Data Collection and Definitions

Data were collected using self‐designed questionnaires (Supporting Information 1: Table S1) through face‐to‐face interviews. The collected information included: (1) demographic and socioeconomic characteristics (gender, age, marital status, educational level, cohabitation status, self‐care ability in daily living, and annual household income); (2) clinical and comorbidity‐related factors (diabetes duration, glycemic control status, and history of diabetic complications, including nephropathy, retinopathy, neuropathy, and diabetic foot disease, other chronic disease); (3) medication‐related factors (use of insulin, thiazolidinedione, sulfonylurea, sedative‐hypnotic, or psychotropic medications); (4) physical function and mobility factors (dizziness, fatigue, subjective unsteadiness, and limb paresthesia); (5) psychological and cognitive factors (activity restriction due to fear of falling); and (6) lifestyle and behavioral factors (use of walking aid, smoking status, average daily sleep duration, number of nighttime awakenings, exercise habits, and dietary habits).

In this study, T2DM was defined as meeting at least one of the following criteria: (1) a prior physician‐confirmed diagnosis of T2DM; or (2) the fasting plasma glucose level ≥ 7.0 mmol/L during medical examination. Fall history was assessed by asking participants whether they had experienced any falls in the past 12 months, and if so, the number of falls, along with details on location, cause, nature of injury, and postfall management. Based on the reported number of falls, participants were categorized as non‐fallers (0 falls), single fallers (1 fall), or recurrent fallers (≥ 2 falls). For group comparisons, non‐recurrent fallers were defined as participants who experienced 0 or 1 fall during the past year. Diabetes duration was categorized into three groups: < 5 years, 5–10 years, and > 10 years [15]. Polypharmacy was defined as the use of four or more medications [16, 17]. Body weight status of the study participants was categorized into underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 24 kg/m2), overweight (24 kg/m2 ≤ BMI <28 kg/m2), and obesity (BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2) [18]. Central obesity was defined as a waist circumference ≥ 90 cm for men and ≥ 80 cm for women [19]. A calf circumference of less than 34 cm in men and less than 33 cm in women was defined as an increased risk of sarcopenia [20].

2.3. Measurement Methods

Height and weight were measured using calibrated stadiometers and scales. Calf circumference was measured at the maximal girth of the calf using a nonelastic tape, and waist circumference was measured at the midpoint between the lower costal margin and the iliac crest, both recorded to the nearest 0.1 cm. Balance performance was assessed using the X16 balance testing scale (X16‐BS) [21], with total scores ranging from 0 to 20. Balance performance was dichotomized into intact (score ≥ 17) versus impaired (score < 17). Depressive symptom severity was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 (PHQ‐9) [22]. Participants were dichotomized into those with depressive symptoms (score: 5–27) and those without (score: 0–4). The Chinese version of the 16‐item Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES‐I) was administered to participants [23, 24]. Each item was rated from 1 (not at all concerned) to 4 (very concerned), with total scores ranging from 16 to 64. Based on established criteria [25], participants were classified into three groups: low concern (16–19), moderate concern (20–27), and high concern (28–64). Cognitive impairment was screened using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), applying the following classification: normal cognition (score ≥ 23) and cognitive impairment (score ≤ 22) [26, 27]. The MoCA was used under authorization from MoCA Test Inc. for this noncommercial academic research and is not reproduced in this manuscript.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 22.0). Descriptive data was reported as frequencies, and percentages. For comparisons of categorical variables, Pearson′s chi‐square test was used when all expected cell counts were ≥ 5. When this assumption was violated, Fisher′s exact test was used for 2 × 2 tables and the Fisher–Freeman–Halton exact test for R × C tables. Multicollinearity was assessed using the variance inflation factor (VIF), with VIF values for all variables ranging from 1.0 to 1.5. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to analyze factors associated with falls (fallers vs. nonfallers) and recurrent falls (recurrent fallers vs. nonrecurrent fallers). Variables were selected for inclusion based on clinical relevance and prior literature, rather than on statistical significance alone. For falls, three hierarchical models were constructed. For recurrent falls, three models were also constructed, with the number of factors strictly limited to four due to the limited number of recurrent fall events. All variables were entered simultaneously using the enter method and the results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Missing data for continuous variables [PHQ‐9 (n = 30, 3.6%), FES‐I (Ch) (n = 17, 2.0%), MoCA (n = 21, 2.5%), and BMI (n = 9, 1.1%)] were imputed using the mean of the observed values prior to categorization into PHQ‐9 depression category, fall efficacy category, presence of cognitive impairment, and body weight status, respectively. For the categorical variable (total annual household income in the past year: n = 31, 3.7%), mode imputation was applied. All results were considered statistically significant at two‐sided p value < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Description of the Participants

This study included 842 elderly diabetic patients, consisting of 333 males and 509 females. The mean age of the total population was 72.2 ± 6.2 years, with more than half (54.6%) in the 70–79 years age group. 11.5% of participants reported living alone, and 92.6% preserved their self‐care ability in daily living. Among clinical and comorbidity‐related factors, 65.6% had a diabetes duration of ≥ 5 years, 13.4% had a history of diabetic complications, and 27.1% were taking ≥ 4 medications. Among psychological and cognitive factors, 11.6% had depressive symptoms, 35.0% exhibited cognitive impairment, 24.7% restricted their activities due to fear of falling and 46.8% reported high concern about falling. For lifestyle and behavioral factors, 81.8% were physically inactive, 10.5% were smokers, and 52.3% had a nighttime sleep duration of < 7 h. A number of baseline characteristics exhibited significant gender disparities, including age, educational level, status of living, presence of multimorbidity, presence of unsteadiness, presence of central obesity, smoking, and nighttime sleep duration (all p < 0.05) (Table 1). Other baseline characteristics and potential factors, overall and by sex, are shown in Table S2.

Table 1Baseline characteristics and potential associated factors for falls among the elderly with T2DM, overall and by sex.

Variables Overall (N = 842) Male (N = 333) Female (N = 509) χ2 p

Age (years) 22.251 < 0.001

60–69 283 (33.6%) 88 (26.4%) 195 (38.3%)

70–79 460 (54.6%) 188 (56.5%) 272 (53.4%)

≥ 80 99 (11.8%) 57 (17.1%) 42 (8.3%)

Educational level 20.143 < 0.001

Primary school or below 72 (8.6%) 26 (7.8%) 46 (9%)

Junior high school 341 (40.5%) 118 (35.4%) 223 (43.8%)

Senior high school or technical secondary school 307 (36.5%) 119 (35.7%) 188 (36.9%)

Junior college or above 122 (14.5%) 70 (21.0%) 52 (10.2%)

Living alone 20.207 < 0.001

No 745 (88.5%) 315 (94.6%) 430 (84.5%)

Yes 97 (11.5%) 18 (5.4%) 79 (15.5%)

Self‐care in daily living 0.020 0.888

No 62 (7.4%) 24 (7.2%) 38 (7.5%)

Yes 780 (92.6%) 309 (92.8%) 471 (92.5%)

Duration of diabetes (years) 1.245 0.537

< 5 290 (34.4%) 108 (32.4%) 182 (35.8%)

5–10 248 (29.5%) 104 (31.2%) 144 (28.3%)

> 10 304 (36.1%) 121 (36.3%) 183 (36.0%)

History of diabetic complications 0.468 0.494

No 729 (86.6%) 285 (85.6%) 444 (87.2%)

Yes 113 (13.4%) 48 (14.4%) 65 (12.8%)

Presence of multimorbidity (≥ 5 conditions) 14.568 < 0.001

No 685 (81.4%) 292 (87.7%) 393 (77.2%)

Yes 157 (18.6%) 41 (12.3%) 116 (22.8%)

Polypharmacy (≥ 4 medications) 0.587 0.444

No 614 (72.9%) 238 (71.5%) 376 (73.9%)

Yes 228 (27.1%) 95 (28.5%) 133 (26.1%)

Subjective unsteadiness 4.294 0.038

No 583 (69.2%) 217 (65.2%) 366 (71.9%)

Yes 259 (30.8%) 116 (34.8%) 143 (28.1%)

Central obesity 80.380 < 0.001

No 317 (37.6%) 187 (56.2%) 130 (25.5%)

Yes 525 (62.4%) 146 (43.8%) 379 (74.5%)

PHQ‐9 depression category

Without depressive symptoms 744 (88.4%) 302 (90.7%) 442 (86.8%) 2.907 0.088

With depressive symptoms 98 (11.6%) 31 (9.3%) 67 (13.2%)

Activity restriction due to fear of falling 1.823 0.177

No 634 (75.3%) 259 (77.8%) 375 (73.7%)

Yes 208 (24.7%) 74 (22.2%) 134 (26.3%)

Fall efficacy category 2.593 0.273

Low concern 213 (25.3%) 92 (27.6%) 121 (23.8%)

Moderate concern 235 (27.9%) 96 (28.8%) 139 (27.3%)

High concern 394 (46.8%) 145 (43.5%) 249 (48.9%)

Presence of cognitive impairment 1.640 0.200

Normal cognition 547 (65.0%) 225 (67.6%) 322 (63.3%)

Cognitive impairment 295 (35.0%) 108 (32.4%) 187 (36.7%)

Habitual exercise 0.074 0.785

No 689 (81.8%) 271 (81.4%) 418 (82.1%)

Yes 153 (18.2%) 62 (18.6%) 91 (17.9%)

Smoking 103.683 < 0.001

No 754 (89.5%) 254 (76.3%) 500 (98.2%)

Yes 88 (10.5%) 79 (23.7%) 9 (1.8%)

Nighttime sleep duration ≥ 7 h 3.911 0.048

No 440 (52.3%) 160 (48.0%) 280 (55.0%)

Yes 402 (47.7%) 173 (52.0%) 229 (45.0%)

Note: History of diabetic complications was defined as the presence of any of the following: diabetic nephropathy, diabetic eye disease, diabetic neuropathy, or diabetic foot disease. Bolded values denote variables with statistically significant gender‐based differences (between males and females).

3.2. Univariate Analysis of Potential Factors Associated With Falls

In total, 239 of the 842 participants (28.4%) experienced at least one fall in the past year. Among these fallers, 41 individuals (17.2%) had recurrent falls, accounting for 4.9% of the total study population. The comparison of potential factors across different fall categories was presented in Table 2 and Table S3. Fall status was significantly associated with a range of factors, encompassing the lack of self‐care ability, physical impairments (frequent dizziness, persistent fatigue, subjective unsteadiness, limb paresthesia, poor balance), psychological factors (depression, activity restriction due to fear of falling, concern about falling), and lifestyle factors (inactivity, poor sleep, frequent nocturia, use of walking aids) (all p < 0.05). Factors significantly associated with recurrent falls included history of diabetic complications, frequent dizziness, persistent fatigue, subjective unsteadiness, limb paresthesia, depression, activity reduction due to fear of falling, frequent nocturia, and use of walking aids (all p < 0.05) (Table 2). Other variables were not significantly associated with either falls or recurrent falls (all p > 0.05) (Supporting Information 1: Table S3).

Table 2Comparison of potential associated factors across different fall categories.

Variables Total fallers (N = 239) Nonfallers (N = 603) χ2 p Nonrecurrent fallers (N = 801) Recurrent fallers (N = 41) χ2 p

Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics

Independence in activities of daily living 4.692 0.030 ‐a
0.113

No 25 (10.5%) 37 (6.1%) 56 (7.0%) 6 (14.6%)

Yes 214 (89.5%) 566 (93.9%) 745 (93.0%) 35 (85.4%)

Clinical and comorbidity‐related factors

History of diabetic complications 1.220 0.269 4.464 0.035

No 202 (84.5%) 527 (87.4%) 698 (87.1%) 31 (75.6%)

Yes 37 (15.5%) 76 (12.6%) 103 (12.9%) 10 (24.4%)

Physical function and mobility factors

Frequent dizziness 6.683 0.010 5.349 0.021

No 162 (67.8%) 461 (76.5%) 599 (74.8%) 24 (58.5%)

Yes 77 (32.2%) 142 (23.5%) 202 (25.2%) 17 (41.5%)

Persistent fatigue 4.819 0.028 20.033 < 0.001

No 201 (84.1%) 540 (89.6%) 714 (89.1%) 27 (65.9%)

Yes 38 (15.9%) 63 (10.4%) 87 (10.9%) 14 (34.1%)

Subjective unsteadiness 34.538 < 0.001 15.613 < 0.001

No 130 (54.4%) 453 (75.1%) 566 (70.7%) 17 (41.5%)

Yes 109 (45.6%) 150 (24.9%) 235 (29.3%) 24 (58.5%)

History of limb paresthesia 3.905 0.048 11.430 0.001

No 140 (58.6%) 397 (65.8%) 521 (65.0%) 16 (39%)

Yes 99 (41.4%) 206 (34.2%) 280 (35.0%) 25 (61%)

Balance test score 19.333 < 0.001 2.451 0.117

≥ 17 163 (68.2%) 495 (82.1%) 630 (78.7%) 28 (68.3%)

< 17 76 (31.8%) 108 (17.9%) 171 (21.3%) 13 (31.7%)

Psychological and cognitive factors

PHQ‐9 depression category 13.096 < 0.001 ‐a
0.045

Without depressive symptoms 196 (82.0%) 548 (90.9%) 712 (88.9%) 32 (78.0%)

With depressive symptoms 43 (18.0%) 55 (9.1%) 89 (11.1%) 9 (22.0%)

Activity restriction due to fear of falling 45.260 < 0.001 6.509 0.011

No 142 (59.4%) 492 (81.6%) 610 (76.2%) 24 (58.5%)

Yes 97 (40.6%) 111 (18.4%) 191 (23.8%) 17 (41.5%)

Fall efficacy category 16.244 < 0.001 3.225 0.199

Low concern 46 (19.2%) 167 (27.7%) 207 (25.8%) 6 (14.6%)

Moderate concern 55 (23.0%) 180 (29.9%) 224 (28.0%) 11 (26.8%)

High concern 138 (57.7%) 256 (42.5%) 370 (46.2%) 24 (58.5%)

Lifestyle and behavioral factors

Habitual exercise 6.070 0.014 1.035 0.309

No 208 (87%) 481 (79.8%) 653 (81.5%) 36 (87.8%)

Yes 31 (13%) 122 (20.2%) 148 (18.5%) 5 (12.2%)

Nighttime sleep duration ≥ 7 h 4.023 0.045 0.209 0.648

No 138 (57.7%) 302 (50.1%) 420 (52.4%) 20 (48.8%)

Yes 101 (42.3%) 301 (49.9%) 381 (47.6%) 21 (51.2%)

Frequent nocturia (≥ 2 times/night) 4.765 0.029 4.959 0.026

No 125 (52.3%) 365 (60.5%) 473 (59.1%) 17 (41.5%)

Yes 114 (47.7%) 238 (39.5%) 328 (40.9%) 24 (58.5%)

Daily use of walking aids 3.892 0.049 -a 0.018

No 216 (90.4%) 568 (94.2%) 750 (93.6%) 34 (82.9%)

Yes 23 (9.6%) 35 (5.8%) 51 (6.4%) 7 (17.1%)

Note: The bolded texts represent values (including χ2 and p values) with statistically significant differences between fallers and nonfallers, as well as between recurrent fallers and nonrecurrent fallers.

aFisher′s exact test was used for variables with expected cell counts < 5.

3.3. Multivariable Analysis of Potential Factors Associated With Falls

Table 3 presents the results of the multivariable logistic regression analysis for factors associated with falls. In the fully adjusted model (Model 3), balance test score (OR = 1.687, 95% CI: 1.162–2.447, p = 0.006), PHQ‐9 depression category (OR = 1.663, 95% CI: 1.028–2.691, p = 0.038) and activity restriction due to fear of falling (OR = 2.503, 95% CI: 1.752–3.575, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with falls in the elderly with T2DM. The remaining variables in the model did not reach statistical significance (Table 3).

Table 3Binary logistic regression analysis of factors associated with falls in the elderly with T2DM (N = 842).

Variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3

Adjusted OR (95% CI) p Adjusted OR (95% CI) p Adjusted OR (95% CI) p

Gender

Male Ref Ref Ref

Female 1.268 (0.925–1.738) 0.140 1.257 (0.912–1.733) 0.162 1.133 (0.814–1.577) 0.459

Age (years)

60–69 Ref Ref Ref

70–79 1.178 (0.842–1.649) 0.339 1.070 (0.758–1.509) 0.701 0.918 (0.642–1.312) 0.637

≥ 80 1.173 (0.696–1.978) 0.550 0.980 (0.568–1.692) 0.944 0.743 (0.419–1.320) 0.311

Duration of Diabetes (years)

<5 Ref Ref Ref

5–10 0.970 (0.661–1.424) 0.876 0.983 (0.667–1.450) 0.932 0.983 (0.659–1.466) 0.934

> 10 1.141 (0.794–1.640) 0.475 1.168 (0.809–1.688) 0.406 1.181 (0.808–1.725) 0.390

History of diabetic complications

No Ref Ref Ref

Yes 1.197 (0.775–1.849) 0.418 1.186 (0.763–1.845) 0.448 0.930 (0.578–1.495) 0.763

Polypharmacy (≥ 4 medications)

No Ref Ref Ref

Yes 1.189 (0.849–1.666) 0.313 1.153 (0.818–1.626) 0.416 1.061 (0.743–1.515) 0.743

Balance test score —

≥ 17 Ref Ref

< 17 2.117 (1.486–3.017) < 0.001 1.687 (1.162–2.447) 0.006

Increased risk of sarcopenia —

No Ref Ref

Yes 0.835 (0.603–1.157) 0.278 0.771 (0.551–1.079) 0.129

Presence of cognitive impairment —

Normal cognition Ref Ref

Cognitive impairment 0.934 (0.676–1.292) 0.682 0.842 (0.601–1.180) 0.317

PHQ‐9 depression category — —

Without depressive symptoms Ref

With depressive symptoms 1.663 (1.028–2.691) 0.038

Activity restriction due to fear of falling — —

No Ref

Yes 2.503 (1.752–3.575) < 0.001

Fall efficacy category — —

Low concern Ref

Moderate concern 1.014 (0.641–1.604) 0.953

High concern 1.457 (0.959–2.216) 0.078

Note: Model 1: adjusted for gender, age, duration of diabetes, history of diabetic complications and polypharmacy. Model 2: adjusted for gender, age, duration of diabetes, history of diabetic complications, polypharmacy, balance test score, increased risk of sarcopenia and presence of cognitive impairment. Model 3: adjusted for gender, age, duration of diabetes, history of diabetic complications, polypharmacy, balance test score, increased risk of sarcopenia, presence of cognitive impairment, PHQ‐9 depression category, activity restriction due to fear of falling and fall efficacy category. The bolded texts represent the p values of variables that are significantly associated with falls in the models.

Table 4 summarizes the associations between potential factors and recurrent falls across three logistic regression models. Activity restriction due to fear of falling remained significantly associated with recurrent falls in Model 2 (OR = 2.165, 95% CI: 1.107–4.235, p = 0.024) and Model 3 (OR = 2.045, 95% CI: 1.057–3.955, p = 0.034) (Table 4).

Table 4Binary logistic regression analysis of factors associated with recurrent falls in the elderly with T2DM (N = 842).

Variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3

Adjusted OR (95% CI) p Adjusted OR (95% CI) p Adjusted OR (95% CI) p

Gender —

Male Ref Ref

Female 0.943 (0.492–1.806) 0.859 0.838 (0.433–1.622) 0.600

Age (years) —

60–69 Ref Ref

70–79 0.723 (0.358–1.458) 0.364 0.644 (0.315–1.313) 0.226

≥ 80 1.220 (0.469–3.179) 0.683 1.027 (0.388–2.717) 0.957

Duration of diabetes (years) —

< 5 Ref Ref

5–10 0.965 (0.409–2.280) 0.935 0.965 (0.408–2.286) 0.936

> 10 1.378 (0.643–2.952) 0.410 1.366 (0.641–2.910) 0.419

History of diabetic complications —

No Ref Ref

Yes 2.076 (0.972–4.433) 0.059 1.696 (0.767–3.747) 0.192

PHQ‐9 depression category —

Without depressive symptoms Ref Ref

With depressive symptoms 2.032 (0.917–4.505) 0.081 1.551 (0.672–3.581) 0.304

Activity restriction due to fear of falling —

No Ref Ref

Yes 2.165 (1.107–4.235) 0.024 2.045 (1.057–3.955) 0.034

Note: Model 1: adjusted for gender, age, duration of diabetes and history of diabetic complications. Model 2: adjusted for gender, age, PHQ‐9 depression category and activity restriction due to fear of falling. Model 3: adjusted for duration of diabetes, history of diabetic complications, PHQ‐9 depression category and activity restriction due to fear of falling. The bolded texts represent the p values of variables that are significantly associated with recurrent falls in the models.

4. Discussion

In this study, we systematically examined the prevalence of falls and its associated factors among older adults with T2DM. Our findings reveal a considerable fall burden in this urban Shanghai population, with 28.4% of participants reporting at least one fall and 17.2% of those who fell experiencing recurrent falls within the preceding year. The independent associations observed for balance impairment, depressive symptoms, and activity restriction due to fear of falling are consistent with the hypothesis that falls in older adults arise from a complex interplay of physical, psychological, and behavioral determinants.

The fall prevalence observed in our study exceeded that documented in comparable populations from Taiwan (19.8%) [28], Guangzhou (21.96%) [29] and Hong Kong (23.3%) [30]. Conversely, certain international studies have reported higher figures, including a rate of 39% among diabetic individuals over 65 years of age in London [13, 31]. This could be attributed to differences in demographic characteristics and study periods. Of particular note, the fall and recurrent fall rates in our diabetic sample were higher than those reported in the majority of previous studies involving general older population [32–34]. Given the profound implications for patients, their families, and the broader healthcare system, this elevated fall risk in the diabetic elderly population calls for prioritized attention. Therefore, targeted investigations into fall‐related factors among community‐dwelling older adults with diabetes in urban Shanghai are urgently warranted.

In univariable analyses, falls and recurrent falls were significantly associated with self‐perceived physical function‐related factors, including dizziness, fatigue, subjective unsteadiness, limb paresthesia, and activity restriction due to fear of falling. These findings are supported by previous research demonstrating that factors such as dizziness, fatigue, and activity restriction due to fear of falling are independent predictors of accidental falls in elderly patients with diabetes [35–37]. However, it is important to recognize that some of these factors may represent consequences rather than antecedents of falls. For instance, activity restriction may arise from fear following a prior fall, and subjective unsteadiness or fatigue could be exacerbated by reduced physical activity after a fall event. Therefore, the potential for reverse causality should be carefully considered when interpreting these associations. In addition, several modifiable behavioral factors were significantly associated with falls, including physical inactivity, short sleep duration, frequent nocturia, and use of walking aids. These findings are consistent with previous literature [36, 38–40]. For example, a large population‐based study using data from the Korean Community Health Survey showed that more frequent nocturia was associated with progressively higher odds of falls [40]. In summary, our findings align with the World Falls Guidelines [1], supporting the multifactorial nature of falls and the implementation of multidomain screening in community‐dwelling older adults with diabetes.

Multivariate regression analysis identified balance test score, depressive symptoms (assessed by the PHQ‐9) and activity restriction due to fear of falling as factors independently associated with falls. Previous studies have shown that balance impairment contributes to increased fall risk in older adults with Type 2 diabetes [10, 41, 42]. This may be explained by the fact that diabetes affects balance primarily through multisystem impairments, including peripheral neuropathy, visual dysfunction, and vestibular impairment, which collectively compromise proprioception, sensory feedback, and postural control, thereby increasing the risk of falls [10, 43, 44]. Furthermore, depressive symptoms warrant integrated consideration, as they have been consistently associated with falls in previous studies [28, 36, 45], which aligns with our findings. Depression may increase fall risk in older adults with diabetes through multiple pathways [45–48], among which the most frequently cited involves cognitive deficits that affect attention, executive function, and processing speed, thereby contributing to an elevated risk of falls [49]. Consistent with the ADA′s 4Ms framework for geriatric diabetes care [50], fall screening in older adults with diabetes should extend beyond physical function to include psychological assessment for depression and cognitive status. Several factors have been reported to be associated with falls in individuals with diabetes, including gender, age, diabetes duration, history of complications, polypharmacy, sarcopenia, and cognitive impairment [28, 29, 45, 51–54]. However, none of these factors reached statistical significance in our sample. These discrepancies may be attributed to differences in study populations and the relatively low prevalence of certain factors in our sample, which limited statistical power to detect modest associations. In addition, variations in variable definitions and measurement tools across studies may have contributed to the inconsistent findings. Notably, our study identified activity restriction due to fear of falling as a significant correlate of recurrent falls. Previous research has linked recurrent falls in older adults with diabetes to various factors, such as gait and balance problems, hypotension, polypharmacy, and HbA1c level [30, 55]. However, research specifically focusing on recurrent falls in this population remains limited in China, highlighting the need for further investigation. Collectively, our findings support the integration of physical, psychological, and behavioral assessments into fall screening strategies for older adults with diabetes.

Our study revealed both the incidence of falls and their associated factors among elderly diabetic patients in community. A key strength of this study is the integrated application of multiple specialized questionnaires to identify various factors associated with falls among elderly diabetic patients, providing valuable insights for the development of targeted fall screening strategies. However, the limitations in this study should also be acknowledged. First, the retrospective assessment of fall history and self‐reported complication data may have introduced recall bias. Second, the temporal relationship between the examined factors and falls could not be established owing to the cross‐sectional design of this study. Third, this study was conducted in a single urban district of Shanghai. The findings may not be directly generalized to older adults with T2DM in other regions. Fourth, we did not collect objective glycemic control measures (e.g., HbA1c) or detailed information on hypoglycemia‐prone therapies or hypoglycemic episodes, which may limit the disease‐specific interpretation of our findings. Given these constraints, large‐scale, multicenter prospective studies incorporating comprehensive clinical and laboratory assessments are warranted to validate our findings and further clarify the role of diabetes‐specific factors in fall risk among older adults.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, our findings demonstrate a considerable fall burden among community‐dwelling older adults with T2DM in urban Shanghai, with associated factors spanning physical, psychological, and behavioral domains. These findings underscore the need to expand diabetes care beyond traditional glucose‐centric approaches and advocate for the integration of multidomain fall screening in this population. Particular attention should be given to elderly individuals with poor balance, depression or activity restriction due to fear of falling. Screening for these factors may facilitate early identification of those at risk and inform targeted assessment approaches.

Author Contributions

Methodology and investigation: Zhenping Lu, Hui Gao, Huiyao Zhu, Dong Chen, Yinzhu Zhuang, Lei Zhang, Li Yu, Qinghua Xia, and Yu Jiang. Data curation, formal analysis, and writing—original draft: Zhenping Lu. Conceptualization, supervision, and writing—review and editing: Yu Jiang and Qinghua Xia.

Funding

This study was supported by the Shanghai New Three‐year Action Plan for Public Health (GWVI‐11.2‐XD05) and The Master and Doctoral‐level innovative talent program on “Multi‐Dimensional Diabetes Management” (RCJD2021S06).

Disclosure

All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Yu Jiang had full access to all of the data in this study and takes complete responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Ethics Statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Changning District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai (No.: 2023‐08). All participants received comprehensive information about the study and provided written informed consent prior to enrollment. We confirm that all methods were performed in strict accordance with the applicable guidelines and regulations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supporting Information

Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section.

Supporting information

1Montero-Odasso M. ,
van der Velde N. ,
Martin F. C. ,
Petrovic M. ,
Tan M. P. ,
Ryg J. ,
Aguilar-Navarro S. ,
Alexander N. B. ,
Becker C. ,
Blain H. ,
Bourke R. ,
Cameron I. D. ,
Camicioli R. ,
Clemson L. ,
Close J. ,
Delbaere K. ,
Duan L. ,
Duque G. ,
Dyer S. M. ,
Freiberger E. ,
Ganz D. A. ,
Gómez F. ,
Hausdorff J. M. ,
Hogan D. B. ,
Hunter S. M. W. ,
Jauregui J. R. ,
Kamkar N. ,
Kenny R. A. ,
Lamb S. E. ,
Latham N. K. ,
Lipsitz L. A. ,
Liu-Ambrose T. ,
Logan P. ,
Lord S. R. ,
Mallet L. ,
Marsh D. ,
Milisen K. ,
Moctezuma-Gallegos R. ,
Morris M. E. ,
Nieuwboer A. ,
Perracini M. R. ,
Pieruccini-Faria F. ,
Pighills A. ,
Said C. ,
Sejdic E. ,
Sherrington C. ,
Skelton D. A. ,
Dsouza S. ,
Speechley M. ,
Stark S. ,
Todd C. ,
Troen B. R. ,
van der Cammen T. ,
Verghese J. ,
Vlaeyen E. ,
Watt J. A. ,
Masud T. , and
Task Force on Global Guidelines for Falls in Older Adults , World Guidelines for Falls Prevention and Management for Older Adults: A Global Initiative , Age and Ageing . (2022 ) 51 , no. 9, 10.1093/ageing/afac205 , 36178003.PMC9523684 36178003

2James S. L. ,
Lucchesi L. R. ,
Bisignano C. ,
Castle C. D. ,
Dingels Z. V. ,
Fox J. T. ,
Hamilton E. B. ,
Henry N. J. ,
Krohn K. J. ,
Liu Z. ,
McCracken D. ,
Nixon M. R. ,
Roberts N. L. S. ,
Sylte D. O. ,
Adsuar J. C. ,
Arora A. ,
Briggs A. M. ,
Collado-Mateo D. ,
Cooper C. ,
Dandona L. ,
Dandona R. ,
Ellingsen C. L. ,
Fereshtehnejad S. M. ,
Gill T. K. ,
Haagsma J. A. ,
Hendrie D. ,
Jürisson M. ,
Kumar G. A. ,
Lopez A. D. ,
Miazgowski T. ,
Miller T. R. ,
Mini G. K. ,
Mirrakhimov E. M. ,
Mohamadi E. ,
Olivares P. R. ,
Rahim F. ,
Riera L. S. ,
Villafaina S. ,
Yano Y. ,
Hay S. I. ,
Lim S. S. ,
Mokdad A. H. ,
Naghavi M. , and
Murray C. J. L. , The Global Burden of Falls: Global, Regional and National Estimates of Morbidity and Mortality From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 , Injury Prevention: Journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention . (2020 ) 26 , no. Supplement 2, i3 –i11 , 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043286 , 31941758.PMC7571347 31941758

3Vaishya R. and
Vaish A. , Falls in Older Adults are Serious , Indian Journal of Orthopaedics . (2020 ) 54 , no. 1, 69 –74 , 10.1007/s43465-019-00037-x , 32257019.PMC7093636 32257019

4Xue L. ,
Wang H. ,
He Y. ,
Sui M. ,
Li H. ,
Mei L. , and
Ying X. , Incidence and Risk Factors of Diabetes Mellitus in the Chinese Population: A Dynamic Cohort Study , BMJ Open . (2022 ) 12 , no. 11, e060730, 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060730 , 36410801.PMC9680191 36410801

5Lamb S. E. ,
Jørstad-Stein E. C. ,
Hauer K. ,
Becker C. , and
on behalf of the Prevention of Falls Network Europe and Outcomes Consensus Group , Development of a Common Outcome Data Set for Fall Injury Prevention Trials: the Prevention of Falls Network Europe Consensus , Journal of the American Geriatrics Society . (2005 ) 53 , no. 9, 1618 –1622 , 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53455.x , 16137297.16137297

6Yang Y. ,
Hu X. ,
Zhang Q. , and
Zou R. , Diabetes Mellitus and Risk of Falls in Older Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , Age and Ageing . (2016 ) 45 , no. 6, 761 –767 , 10.1093/ageing/afw140 , 27515679.27515679

7Zhou H. ,
Peng K. ,
Tiedemann A. ,
Peng J. , and
Sherrington C. , Risk Factors for Falls Among Older Community Dwellers in Shenzhen, China , Injury Prevention: Journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention . (2019 ) 25 , no. 1, 31 –35 , 10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042597 , 29475977.29475977

8Mailliez A. ,
Chen Y. ,
Litke R. ,
Gloria S. ,
Chekroud H. ,
Huvent-Grelle D. ,
Mirakovska L. ,
Gaxatte C. , and
Puisieux F. , Fall Risk Factors and Other Geriatric Syndromes in Older Adults With Diabetes: Experience of a Multidisciplinary Fall Consultation , Journal of Diabetes Research . (2025 ) 2025 , 6145818, 10.1155/jdr/6145818 , 40893591.PMC12393927 40893591

9Vinik A. I. ,
Camacho P. ,
Reddy S. ,
Valencia W. M. ,
Trence D. ,
Matsumoto A. M. , and
Morley J. E. , Aging, Diabetes, and Falls , Endocrine Practice: Official Journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists . (2017 ) 23 , no. 9, 1120 –1142 , 10.4158/ep171794.Ra .28704101

10Hewston P. and
Deshpande N. , Falls and Balance Impairments in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Thinking Beyond Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy , Canadian Journal of Diabetes . (2016 ) 40 , no. 1, 6 –9 , 10.1016/j.jcjd.2015.08.005 , 26778679.26778679

11Freire L. B. ,
Brasil-Neto J. P. ,
da Silva M. L. ,
Miranda M. G. C. ,
de Mattos Cruz L. ,
Martins W. R. , and
da Silva Paz L. P. , Risk factors for Falls in Older Adults With Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , BMC Geriatrics . (2024 ) 24 , no. 1, 10.1186/s12877-024-04668-0 , 38413865.PMC10900672 38413865

12Roman de Mettelinge T. ,
Cambier D. ,
Calders P. ,
van den Noortgate N. , and
Delbaere K. , Understanding the Relationship Between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Falls in Older Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study , PloS One . (2013 ) 8 , no. 6, e67055, 10.1371/journal.pone.0067055 , 23825617.PMC3692422 23825617

13Mesinovic J. ,
Scott D. ,
Seibel M. J. ,
Cumming R. G. ,
Naganathan V. ,
Blyth F. M. ,
le Couteur D. G. ,
Waite L. M. ,
Handelsman D. J. , and
Hirani V. , Risk Factors for Incident Falls and Fractures in Older Men With and Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project , Journals of Gerontology Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences . (2021 ) 76 , no. 6, 1090 –1100 , 10.1093/gerona/glab062 , 33649759.33649759

14Alasmari R. S. ,
Hassani H. A. ,
Almalky N. A. ,
Bokhari A. F. ,
al Zahrani A. , and
Hafez A. A. , Risk Factors for Fall Among the Elderly with Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 2022: A Cross-Sectional Study , Annals of Medicine and Surgery . (2023 ) 85 , no. 3, 427 –432 , 10.1097/ms9.0000000000000269 , 36923742.PMC10010846 36923742

15Klein R. ,
Klein B. E. ,
Moss S. E. ,
Davis M. D. , and
DeMets D. L. , The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy: II. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is less than 30 years , Archives of Ophthalmology . (1984 ) 102 , no. 4, 520 –526 , (Chicago, Ill : 1960)10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030398010 .6367724

16Ziere G. ,
Dieleman J. P. ,
Hofman A. ,
Pols H. A. P. ,
van der Cammen T. J. M. , and
Stricker B. H. C. H. , Polypharmacy and Falls in the Middle Age and Elderly Population , British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology . (2006 ) 61 , no. 2, 218 –223 , 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02543.x , 16433876.PMC1885000 16433876

17Buatois S. ,
Perret-Guillaume C. ,
Gueguen R. ,
Miget P. ,
Vançon G. ,
Perrin P. , and
Benetos A. , A Simple Clinical Scale to Stratify Risk of Recurrent Falls in Community-Dwelling Adults Aged 65 Years and Older , Physical Therapy . (2010 ) 90 , no. 4, 550 –560 , 10.2522/ptj.20090158 , 20203094.20203094

18People′s Medical Publishing House , Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Overweight and Obesity in Chinese Adults (2021) , 2021 , People′s Medical Publishing House.

19Lin L. ,
Xue Y. ,
Huang D. ,
Su Y. ,
Yu H. , and
Zhu P. , Dynapenic Abdominal Obesity and The Risks of Heart Disease and All-Cause Mortality: A 7-Year Longitudinal Study Among Middle-Aged and Older Chinese Adults , BMC Public Health . (2025 ) 25 , no. 1, 10.1186/s12889-025-23664-6 , 40670948.PMC12265241 40670948

20Barbosa-Silva T. G. ,
Menezes A. M. ,
Bielemann R. M. ,
Malmstrom T. K. ,
Gonzalez M. C. , and
Grupo de Estudos em Composição Corporal e Nutrição (COCONUT) , Enhancing SARC-F: Improving Sarcopenia Screening in the Clinical Practice , Journal of the American Medical Directors Association . (2016 ) 17 , no. 12, 1136 –1141 , 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.08.004 , 27650212.27650212

21Ju J. ,
Jiang Y. ,
Zhou P. ,
Li L. ,
Ye X. ,
Wu H. ,
Shen B. ,
Zhang J. ,
He X. ,
Niu C. , and
Xia Q. , Evaluation of the Reliability and Validity for X16 Balance Testing Scale for the Elderly , BMC Geriatrics . (2018 ) 18 , no. 1, 10.1186/s12877-018-0803-6 , 29807543.PMC5971429 29807543

22Kroenke K. ,
Spitzer R. L. , and
Williams J. B. , The PHQ-9: Validity of a Brief Depression Severity Measure , Journal of General Internal Medicine . (2001 ) 16 , no. 9, 606 –613 , 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x , 11556941.PMC1495268 11556941

23Yardley L. ,
Beyer N. ,
Hauer K. ,
Kempen G. ,
Piot-Ziegler C. , and
Todd C. , Development and Initial Validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) , Age and Ageing . (2005 ) 34 , no. 6, 614 –619 , 10.1093/ageing/afi196 , 16267188.16267188

24Kwan M. M. ,
Tsang W. W. ,
Close J. C. , and
Lord S. R. , Development and Validation of a Chinese Version of the Falls Efficacy Scale International , Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics . (2013 ) 56 , no. 1, 169 –174 , 10.1016/j.archger.2012.10.007 , 23116978.23116978

25Delbaere K. ,
Close J. C. ,
Mikolaizak A. S. ,
Sachdev P. S. ,
Brodaty H. , and
Lord S. R. , The Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I). A Comprehensive Longitudinal Validation Study , Age and Ageing . (2010 ) 39 , no. 2, 210 –216 , 10.1093/ageing/afp225 , 20061508.20061508

26Rossetti H. C. ,
Lacritz L. H. ,
Cullum C. M. , and
Weiner M. F. , Normative Data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in a Population-Based Sample , Neurology . (2011 ) 77 , no. 13, 1272 –1275 , 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318230208a , 21917776.21917776

27Carson N. ,
Leach L. , and
Murphy K. J. , A Re-Examination of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Cutoff Scores , International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry . (2018 ) 33 , no. 2, 379 –388 , 10.1002/gps.4756 , 28731508.28731508

28Lin C. L. ,
Wu H. C. ,
Yu N. C. ,
Liu Y. C. ,
Chiu I. Y. , and
Chien W. C. , Risk Factors for Falls in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study , Medicine . (2024 ) 103 , no. 50, e40895, 10.1097/md.0000000000040895 , 39686478.PMC11651476 39686478

29Lin W. Q. ,
Liao Y. X. ,
Wang J. Y. ,
Luo L. Y. ,
Yuan L. X. ,
Sun S. Y. ,
Xu Y. ,
Sun M. Y. ,
Wang C. ,
Zhou Q. ,
Liu X. Y. , and
Liu H. , Associations Between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Risk of Falls Among Community-Dwelling Elderly People in Guangzhou, China: a Prospective Cohort Study , BMC Geriatrics . (2024 ) 24 , no. 1, 10.1186/s12877-024-05314-5 , 39210251.PMC11363668 39210251

30Cheng L. Y. ,
Leung S. Y. , and
Leung M. K. W. , The Association of Glycemic Control and Fall Risk in Diabetic Elderly: A Cross-Sectional Study in Hong Kong , BMC Primary Care . (2022 ) 23 , no. 1, 10.1186/s12875-022-01807-7 , 35915395.PMC9344708 35915395

31Tilling L. M. ,
Darawil K. , and
Britton M. , Falls as a Complication of Diabetes Mellitus in Older People , Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications . (2006 ) 20 , no. 3, 158 –162 , 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2005.06.004 .16632235

32Huang R. ,
Li S. ,
Hu J. ,
Ren R. ,
Ma C. ,
Peng Y. , and
Wang D. , Adverse Childhood Experiences and Falls in Older Adults: The Mediating Role of Depression , Journal of Affective Disorders . (2024 ) 365 , 87 –94 , 10.1016/j.jad.2024.08.080 , 39151763.39151763

33Lin X. Z. ,
Meng R. L. ,
Peng D. D. ,
Li C. ,
Zheng X. Y. ,
Xu H. F. ,
Xu X. J. , and
Lin L. F. , Cross-Sectional Study on Prevalence and Risk Factors for Falls Among the Elderly in Communities of Guangdong Province, China , BMJ Open . (2022 ) 12 , no. 11, e062257, 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062257 , 36375979.PMC9664268 36375979

34Lee J. S. ,
Kwok T. ,
Leung P. C. , and
Woo J. , Medical Illnesses Are More Important Than Medications as Risk Factors of Falls in Older Community Dwellers? A Cross-Sectional Study , Age and Ageing . (2006 ) 35 , no. 3, 246 –251 , 10.1093/ageing/afj056 , 16497683.16497683

35El Sayed A. E. ,
Said M. T. ,
Mohsen O. ,
Abozied A. M. , and
Salama M. , Falls and Associated Risk Factors in a Sample of Old Age Population in Egyptian Community , Frontiers in Public Health . (2023 ) 11 , 1068314, 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1068314 , 36778572.PMC9909230 36778572

36Cheng Z. ,
Li X. ,
Xu H. ,
Bao D. ,
Mu C. , and
Xing Q. , Incidence of Accidental Falls and Development of a Fall Risk Prediction Model Among Elderly Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Cohort Study , Journal of Clinical Nursing . (2023 ) 32 , no. 7-8, 1398 –1409 , 10.1111/jocn.16371 , 35596277.35596277

37Bruce D. ,
Hunter M. ,
Peters K. ,
Davis T. , and
Davis W. , Fear of Falling Is Common in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Is Associated With Increased Risk Of Falls , Age and Ageing . (2015 ) 44 , no. 4, 687 –690 , 10.1093/ageing/afv024 , 25739747.25739747

38Popelsky B. K. ,
Pettee Gabriel K. ,
Dooley E. E. , and
Ylitalo K. R. , Physical Activity Fragmentation and Falls in Older Adults: Findings From the National Health and Aging Trends Study , Journals of Gerontology Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences . (2024 ) 79 , no. 7, glae129, 10.1093/gerona/glae129 , 38733095.PMC11157969 38733095

39Cauley J. A. ,
Hovey K. M. ,
Stone K. L. ,
Andrews C. A. ,
Barbour K. E. ,
Hale L. ,
Jackson R. D. ,
Johnson K. C. ,
LeBlanc E. S. ,
Li W. ,
Zaslavsky O. ,
Ochs-Balcom H. ,
Wactawski-Wende J. , and
Crandall C. J. , Characteristics of Self-Reported Sleep and the Risk of Falls and Fractures: The Women′s Health Initiative (WHI) , Journal of Bone and Mineral Research: The Official Journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research . (2019 ) 34 , no. 3, 464 –474 , 10.1002/jbmr.3619 , 30461066.PMC6563041 30461066

40Kim S. Y. ,
Bang W. ,
Kim M. S. ,
Park B. ,
Kim J. H. , and
Choi H. G. , Nocturia Is Associated With Slipping and Falling , PloS One . (2017 ) 12 , no. 1, e0169690, 10.1371/journal.pone.0169690 , 28060916.PMC5218404 28060916

41Azidah A. K. ,
Hasniza H. , and
Zunaina E. , Prevalence of Falls and Its Associated Factors Among Elderly Diabetes in a Tertiary Center, Malaysia , Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research . (2012 ) 2012 , 539073, 10.1155/2012/539073 , 22693496.PMC3369479 22693496

42Cheng K. ,
Fakorede S. ,
Lateef O. M. ,
Fakorede O. S. ,
Wang D. ,
Liu X. , and
Wang D. , Diabetes-Related Balance Impairment in the Aging Population: A Combined NHANES and Mendelian Randomization Study , Gerontology . (2026 ) no , 1 –12 , 10.1159/000552601 , 42160236.42160236

43Muramatsu K. , Diabetes Mellitus-Related Dysfunction of the Motor System , International Journal of Molecular Sciences . (2020 ) 21 , no. 20, 10.3390/ijms21207485 , 33050583.PMC7589125 33050583

44Lopatin T. ,
Borngesser B. , and
Haworth J. , Cross-Cutting Effect of Type 2 Diabetes on the Sensorimotor Control of Balance , Frontiers in Clinical Diabetes and Healthcare . (2024 ) 5 , 1441947, 10.3389/fcdhc.2024.1441947 , 39845776.PMC11750827 39845776

45Timar B. ,
Timar R. ,
Gaiță L. ,
Oancea C. ,
Levai C. , and
Lungeanu D. , The Impact of Diabetic Neuropathy on Balance and on the Risk of Falls in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study , PloS One . (2016 ) 11 , no. 4, e0154654, 10.1371/journal.pone.0154654 , 27119372.PMC4847853 27119372

46Huang L. ,
Jin W. ,
Liang Z. , and
Chen H. , Associations Between Depressive Symptoms, Activity of Daily Living, and Falls/Severe Falls: Evidence From Two Prospective Longitudinal Studies , Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology . (2026 ) 61 , no. 6, 1047 –1058 , 10.1007/s00127-025-02924-1 , 40389706.40389706

47Lu N. ,
Yan Y. , and
Zhao X. , Social Isolation and Falls Among Older Adults in China: The Mediating Roles of Depressive Symptoms and Cognitive Function, Aging & Mental Health , 2026 , Taylor and Francis, 1 –12 , 10.1080/13607863.2026.2683658 .42249766

48Lv Q. ,
Chen D. ,
Zhu H. ,
Li Z. ,
Qin Y. ,
Zheng C. ,
Cui J. , and
Yu H. , Multi-Trajectory Patterns of ADL, Cognition, and Depression With Fall Risk: Evidence From a Longitudinal Study in China, BMC Geriatrics , 2026 , Springer, 10.1186/s12877-026-07807-x .PMC13584282 42365258

49Gambaro E. ,
Gramaglia C. ,
Azzolina D. ,
Campani D. ,
Molin A. D. , and
Zeppegno P. , The Complex Associations Between Late Life Depression, Fear of Falling and Risk of Falls. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , Ageing Research Reviews . (2022 ) 73 , 101532, 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101532 , 34844015.34844015

50American Diabetes Association , 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025 , Diabetes Care . (2025 ) 48 , no. Supplement 1, S266 –S282 , 10.2337/dc25-S013 , 39651977.PMC11635042 39651977

51Deandrea S. ,
Lucenteforte E. ,
Bravi F. ,
Foschi R. ,
la Vecchia C. , and
Negri E. , Risk Factors for Falls in Community-Dwelling Older People , Epidemiology . (2010 ) 21 , no. 5, 658 –668 , 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181e89905 .20585256

52Zaninotto P. ,
Huang Y. T. ,
Di Gessa G. ,
Abell J. ,
Lassale C. , and
Steptoe A. , Polypharmacy Is a Risk Factor for Hospital Admission due to a Fall: Evidence From the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing , BMC Public Health . (2020 ) 20 , no. 1, 10.1186/s12889-020-09920-x , 33243195.PMC7690163 33243195

53Zhou Q. ,
Zhu Y. ,
Guo Q. ,
Wang W. ,
Wang L. ,
Zhang X. ,
Yang Y. ,
Zhang L. , and
Zhang Y. , Association Between Sarcopenia and Falls, Fractures, Hospital Readmission, and All-Cause Mortality in Older Adults With Endocrine Disorders: A Longitudinal Study of Aging in China , BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders . (2025 ) 26 , no. 1, 10.1186/s12891-025-09117-6 , 40898141.PMC12403857 40898141

54Bayrak M. ,
Kaşali K. ,
Güner M. ,
Cadirci K. ,
Kılıç A. F. , and
Binici D. N. , Risk Factors Influencing Fall Risk in Geriatric Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Comprehensive Analysis , The Aging Male : The Official Journal of the International Society for the Study of the Aging Male . (2025 ) 28 , no. 1, 2469614, 10.1080/13685538.2025.2469614 , 40022664.40022664

55Rashedi V. ,
Iranpour A. ,
Mohseni M. , and
Borhaninejad V. , Risk Factors for Fall in Elderly With Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 , Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome . (2019 ) 13 , no. 4, 2347 –2351 , 10.1016/j.dsx.2019.06.001 .31405641

Come citare questo studio

Zhenping Lu, Hui Gao, Huiyao Zhu, Dong Chen, Yinzhu Zhuang, Lei Zhang, Li Yu, Qinghua Xia, Yu Jiang. (2026). Factors Associated With Falls Among the Elderly With Type 2 Diabetes in Urban Shanghai: A Cross-Sectional Study.. Journal of diabetes research. DOI: 10.1155/jdr/8624656

Consulta la pubblicazione originale ↗